Articles
2018: Readership Course
How do we teach scientific writing of peer-review publications?
- Thomas Bjerring Kristensen
- Per Falås
- Nahikari Irastorza
- Petter Wallentén
-
Submitted
-
October 18, 2019
-
Published
-
2018-10-31
Abstract
It is essential for most doctoral students in Sweden to learn how to write scientific peerreview publications during their studies. In this study, we qualitatively investigate the approach of supervisors in teaching scientific writing to their doctoral students through interviews. In addition, we have interviewed three university teachers with extensive experience in teaching academic writing to doctoral students. They have insights into the needs and challenges doctoral students face while learning scientific writing. Our study
supports that doctoral students face difficult challenges when they have to learn how to write peer-review publications. The level of engagement varies tremendously between different supervisors. About half of the supervisors replicate the supervision style they received as doctoral students. The main challenges the technical doctoral students face are related to focusing the study and the story and relate it to the knowledge in the field. In general, it seems like the reflective/contextual text awareness comes more natural for most of the students in social sciences, whereas the students at the technical faculty need more support in that aspect. The supervisors at LTH all recommend their PhD students to attend a course on scientific writing at LTH, while something similar is not recommended by the supervisors in social sciences.
Similar Articles
-
Johan Axelsson,
Martina Maggio,
Maria Mondejar,
Romina Spalazzese,
Zan Wu,
Perspectives on Motivation in PhD Education and Supervision
,
Project and Conference Reports - CEE, LTH: 2015: Readership Course
-
Malin Alsved,
Jenny Carlsson,
Mikael Sjölin,
Differences in development of scientific identity between industrial and academic PhD students
,
Project and Conference Reports - CEE, LTH: 2024: Docentkurs/Readership course
-
Nikolina Barchan,
Johanna Hjalte,
Nina Muratovska,
Elin Ossiansson,
Ingrid Ramm,
What is a good master thesis supervisor; and how can we become one?
,
Project and Conference Reports - CEE, LTH: 2020: Introduction to Teaching and Learning in Higher Education
-
Salar Haghighatafshar,
Anna S Gerdtsson,
Christina Sakellariou,
Herje Schagerlöf,
Supervision of PhD candidates on practical work at LTH
,
Project and Conference Reports - CEE, LTH: 2021: Docent/Readership course
-
Isabell Mitrovic,
Jimena Ortiz Sempértegui,
Julius Klemens Lorek,
Maja Sondell,
Medya Hatun Tanis,
Supervision of research projects during Ph.D. education: challenges and reflections
,
Project and Conference Reports - CEE, LTH: 2024: Introduction to Teaching and Learning in Higher Education
-
Aneta Wierzbicka,
Jenny Rissler,
Justyna Czemiel Berndtsson,
Per-Olof Hedvall,
Tomas Persson,
Yujing Li,
Expectations on PhD studies – doctoral students versus their supervisors
,
Project and Conference Reports - CEE, LTH: 2011: Readership Course
-
Seyed Amir Naghibi,
Mohamed Ismail,
Xuesong Cai,
Supervisor-Ph.D. Student Relationship: Expectations, Challenges, and Possible Solutions
,
Project and Conference Reports - CEE, LTH: 2022: Docent/Readership course
-
Mikael Blomé,
Daniel Hellström,
Gyöngyi Kovács,
Johan Zetterberg,
Johan Åkesson,
The Role of Courses in PhD Education at the Faculty of Engineering, Lund University
,
Project and Conference Reports - CEE, LTH: 2011: Readership Course
-
Sepideh Gorji Ghalamestani,
Alessandro Schönborn,
Khaldoon A. Mourad,
Per Augustsson,
Daniel Spikol,
Exploring the relationship between PhD students, main and, co-supervisors
,
Project and Conference Reports - CEE, LTH: 2015: Readership Course
-
Johan Linåker,
Günter Alce,
Namsoon Eom,
Jonas Niklewski,
Jenny Iao-Jörgensen,
Enabling PhD student collaboration in research groups
,
Project and Conference Reports - CEE, LTH: 2024: Docentkurs/Readership course
1 2 3 > >>
You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.