Articles
2018: Readership Course
How do we teach scientific writing of peer-review publications?
- Thomas Bjerring Kristensen
- Per Falås
- Nahikari Irastorza
- Petter Wallentén
-
Submitted
-
October 18, 2019
-
Published
-
2018-10-31
Abstract
It is essential for most doctoral students in Sweden to learn how to write scientific peerreview publications during their studies. In this study, we qualitatively investigate the approach of supervisors in teaching scientific writing to their doctoral students through interviews. In addition, we have interviewed three university teachers with extensive experience in teaching academic writing to doctoral students. They have insights into the needs and challenges doctoral students face while learning scientific writing. Our study
supports that doctoral students face difficult challenges when they have to learn how to write peer-review publications. The level of engagement varies tremendously between different supervisors. About half of the supervisors replicate the supervision style they received as doctoral students. The main challenges the technical doctoral students face are related to focusing the study and the story and relate it to the knowledge in the field. In general, it seems like the reflective/contextual text awareness comes more natural for most of the students in social sciences, whereas the students at the technical faculty need more support in that aspect. The supervisors at LTH all recommend their PhD students to attend a course on scientific writing at LTH, while something similar is not recommended by the supervisors in social sciences.
Similar Articles
-
Maria Andersson,
Göran Frank,
Charlotta Nilsson,
Per Persson,
Avo Reinap,
Supervision of PhD students of different cultural background
,
Project and Conference Reports - CEE, LTH: 2012: Readership Course
-
Himani Garg,
Narmin Hushmandi,
Ramesh Saagi,
Emma Tegling,
Doctoral students’ expectations from supervisors when co-authoring papers
,
Project and Conference Reports - CEE, LTH: 2022: Docent/Readership course
-
Carina Geldhauser,
Andreas Langer,
Elena Pagnin,
Tony Stillfjord,
‘What happens next?’ Ph.D. Candidates’ and Supervisors’ Perspectives on Career Paths and Choices After the Defense
,
Project and Conference Reports - CEE, LTH: 2021: Docent/Readership course
-
Adam Kinos,
Ahmet Halil Avci,
David Busto,
Ghjuvan Grimaud,
Jing Li,
Mark Rambaran,
Can AI be a co-supervisor for doctoral students?
,
Project and Conference Reports - CEE, LTH: 2024: Docentkurs/Readership course
-
O. Alexanderson,
C. Dahlhammar,
G. Somesfalean,
L. Wang,
N. Wellander,
Graduate Student Emancipation: - an Investigation on Authorship and Paper Writing
,
Project and Conference Reports - CEE, LTH: 2010: Readership Course
-
Christian Antfolk,
Douglas Di Julio,
Henrik Hassel,
Ying Zhen Li,
Christian Uhr,
Baozhong Zhang,
Scientific writing: a student and supervisor perspective. Needs, support and reality
,
Project and Conference Reports - CEE, LTH: 2015: Readership Course
-
Kimberly Nicholas,
Emily Baird,
Christian Brackman,
Barry Ness,
Simon Niedenthal,
Anna Torstensson,
Sofia Waldemarson,
Student preparedness in Ph.D. education - an assessment of supervisor and student perceptions of fulfilling Swedish third-cycle learning outcomes
,
Project and Conference Reports - CEE, LTH: 2013: Readership Course
-
Luis Mundaca,
Exploring Doctoral Supervision Styles for the Early Stage of the PhD Supervisory Process: Some Concepts, Potential Choices and Suggestions for Beginners (like me!)
,
Project and Conference Reports - CEE, LTH: 2011: Readership Course
-
Akram Abdul Hamid,
Basel Al-Rudainy,
Mikael Lantz,
Gregor Rudolph-Schöpping,
AI IN DOCTORAL SUPERVISION – THREAT OR OPPORTUNITY
,
Project and Conference Reports - CEE, LTH: 2023: Docent/Readership course
-
Kajsa Ahlgren Ode,
David Cuartielles,
Elin Olander,
Joze Tavcar,
Developing critical and creative thinkers
,
Project and Conference Reports - CEE, LTH: 2021: Docent/Readership course
<< < 1 2 3 > >>
You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.