Articles
2018: Readership Course
How do we teach scientific writing of peer-review publications?
- Thomas Bjerring Kristensen
- Per Falås
- Nahikari Irastorza
- Petter Wallentén
-
Submitted
-
October 18, 2019
-
Published
-
2018-10-31
Abstract
It is essential for most doctoral students in Sweden to learn how to write scientific peerreview publications during their studies. In this study, we qualitatively investigate the approach of supervisors in teaching scientific writing to their doctoral students through interviews. In addition, we have interviewed three university teachers with extensive experience in teaching academic writing to doctoral students. They have insights into the needs and challenges doctoral students face while learning scientific writing. Our study
supports that doctoral students face difficult challenges when they have to learn how to write peer-review publications. The level of engagement varies tremendously between different supervisors. About half of the supervisors replicate the supervision style they received as doctoral students. The main challenges the technical doctoral students face are related to focusing the study and the story and relate it to the knowledge in the field. In general, it seems like the reflective/contextual text awareness comes more natural for most of the students in social sciences, whereas the students at the technical faculty need more support in that aspect. The supervisors at LTH all recommend their PhD students to attend a course on scientific writing at LTH, while something similar is not recommended by the supervisors in social sciences.
Similar Articles
-
Al Mansourian,
Damien Motte,
Kristofer Modig,
Henrik Pålsson,
Helena Svensson,
Anders Wretstrand,
Supervision meetings – doctoral students’ and supervisors’ perspectives
,
Project and Conference Reports - CEE, LTH: 2012: Readership Course
-
Per Becker,
Martin Bengtsson,
Daniel Nilsson,
Birgitta Nordquist,
Claes Thelander,
Zsuzsanna Toth-Szabo,
Approaches to doctoral supervision in relation to student expectations
,
Project and Conference Reports - CEE, LTH: 2010: Readership Course
-
Giana Carli Lorenzini,
Christina Sakellariou,
Teaching students of multidisciplinary backgrounds: How to offer equal and fair opportunities for learning
,
Project and Conference Reports - CEE, LTH: 2021: Developing and leading courses at LTH
-
Magnus Carlquist,
Stephen Hall,
Mehrzad Kaiadi,
Jenny Schelin,
Jörgen Svensson,
How to nurture PhD student independence
,
Project and Conference Reports - CEE, LTH: 2012: Readership Course
-
Pierre-Adrien Mante,
Erik Nilsson,
Claus Hedegaard Sørensen,
Supervisor feedback on co-authored papers: How to do it in an appropriate way?
,
Project and Conference Reports - CEE, LTH: 2021: Docent/Readership course
-
Maria Elenius,
Sara Janhäll,
Olof Mundt Petersen,
Research environment satisfaction and progress measures of a few industry PhD candidates
,
Project and Conference Reports - CEE, LTH: 2021: Docent/Readership course
-
Adam Kinos,
Ahmet Halil Avci,
David Busto,
Ghjuvan Grimaud,
Jing Li,
Mark Rambaran,
Can AI be a co-supervisor for doctoral students?
,
Project and Conference Reports - CEE, LTH: 2024: Docentkurs/Readership course
-
Lea Fünfschilling,
Jing Xiao,
Gender-sensitive PhD supervision: A tool to address the leaky pipeline?
,
Project and Conference Reports - CEE, LTH: 2020: Docent/Readership course
-
Helena Svensson,
Mikkel Brydegaard,
Luis Sarmiento,
Arenas for scientific discussion
,
Project and Conference Reports - CEE, LTH: 2015: Readership Course
<< < 1 2 3
You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.