Navigating the methodological risks of ‘othering’ in research on inclusion and exclusion of religion and worldviews in teacher education
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62902/nordidactica.v16i2026:1.27579Keywords:
Methodology, Care Ethics, Othering, Worldview, Socially Sustainable Research, ReligionAbstract
This methodological article explores how the risks of othering can be addressed in educational research on religion and worldviews. Informed by feminist, decolonial, and Indigenous research traditions, the article expands an existing care ethics framework by integrating the principles of reflexivity and respect. A Swedish preschool teacher education project is used as an illustrative example to examine how six dimensions—international, societal, community, situational, event, and act—can guide socially sustainable research design. Rather than offering a fixed model, the framework is presented as a generative tool for reflection and adaptation. The article aims to contribute to ongoing methodological discussions by offering a possible approach to ethically grounded and inclusive research in superdiverse educational contexts.
