Articles
2018: Conference on Teaching and Learning - Proceedings
Lessons of Feedback in Higher Education in Sweden
- Peter Persson
- Stephen Marr
- Klas Hjort
- Arun Rana
- Alfredo Mendoza
-
Submitted
-
October 30, 2019
-
Published
-
2018-12-06
Abstract
Lessons learned in the feedback process are a two-sided coin that ultimately guide the PhD candidate towards becoming an independent researcher as well as educating “reader/docents” in their role as supervisor. Building on a brief literature review, observations from 14 interviewed PhD candidates were reflected upon and these are the suggested lessons learned. The study’s preliminary findings suggest that feedback is most productive when it is organized, systematic, and tends to offer guidance rather than direct instruction. Perhaps of greatest significance is the need to have consistent dialogue about the feedback’s form and content between student and supervisor(s).
Similar Articles
-
Nikolina Barchan,
Johanna Hjalte,
Nina Muratovska,
Elin Ossiansson,
Ingrid Ramm,
What is a good master thesis supervisor; and how can we become one?
,
Project and Conference Reports - CEE, LTH: 2020: Introduction to Teaching and Learning in Higher Education
-
Isabell Mitrovic,
Jimena Ortiz Sempértegui,
Julius Klemens Lorek,
Maja Sondell,
Medya Hatun Tanis,
Supervision of research projects during Ph.D. education: challenges and reflections
,
Project and Conference Reports - CEE, LTH: 2024: Introduction to Teaching and Learning in Higher Education
-
Johan Bonde,
Kenneth Frogner,
Johannes Hedman,
Oskar Larsson,
Javier Sotres,
Investigating the role of the assistant supervisor in PhD education
,
Project and Conference Reports - CEE, LTH: 2016: Readership Course
-
Daniel P Brink,
Sandy Chan,
Christian Nelson,
Maja Sidstedt,
Johannes Svensson,
The Development of Pedagogical Skills in PhD Candidates Through Supervision of Master Projects
,
Project and Conference Reports - CEE, LTH: 2016: Introduction to Teaching and Learning in Higher Education
-
Anna-Lena Sahlberg,
Luigi Nardi,
Marcus Runefors,
Per-Ivar Olsson,
Lars Ohlsson Fhager,
Can a PhD Student Fail?
,
Project and Conference Reports - CEE, LTH: 2021: Docent/Readership course
-
Pierre-Adrien Mante,
Erik Nilsson,
Claus Hedegaard Sørensen,
Supervisor feedback on co-authored papers: How to do it in an appropriate way?
,
Project and Conference Reports - CEE, LTH: 2021: Docent/Readership course
-
Per Becker,
Martin Bengtsson,
Daniel Nilsson,
Birgitta Nordquist,
Claes Thelander,
Zsuzsanna Toth-Szabo,
Approaches to doctoral supervision in relation to student expectations
,
Project and Conference Reports - CEE, LTH: 2010: Readership Course
-
Ingemar Bengtsson,
Joacim Lundberg,
Joakim Wernberg,
Interdisciplinary supervision: Neither, nor, or both?
,
Project and Conference Reports - CEE, LTH: 2022: Docent/Readership course
-
Silvia Arias,
Andreea Marcu,
Clemencio Nhantumbo,
Estevado Pondja,
Johan Rahm,
Navigating the relationship between the supervisor and the PhD student
,
Project and Conference Reports - CEE, LTH: 2015: Introduction to Teaching and Learning in Higher Education
-
Fahed Abou Nada,
Christian Grussler,
Usman Mazhar Mirza,
Hossein Sina,
Luyu Wang,
Communication between Educational and Industrial Enterprises: Industrial PhD Students, the Missing Link
,
Project and Conference Reports - CEE, LTH: 2013: Introduction to Teaching and Learning in Higher Education
1 2 > >>
You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.