'Asphalt Islam' A Multimodal Comparative Analysis of Islam in Contrast to Christianity and Buddhism in Educational Films

Forfattere

  • Danial Ghasempour Stockholm University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62902/nordidactica.v16i2026:1.27395

Emneord (Nøkkelord):

Islam, Multimodal, Educational Films, Comparative, Swedish Religious Education, Asphalt Islam, Rough and Soft Religions, Buddhism, Christianity

Sammendrag

This study employs a comparative and multimodal analysis to examine Islam’s portrayal in Swedish educational films, contrasting it with Christianity and Buddhism. Comparison is essential for understanding each religion’s representation within the same material, while the multimodal approach, focusing on visual, auditory, and textual elements, captures the nuanced portrayals of 'rough' versus 'soft' religions. Islam is depicted as 'rough,' characterised by minimal soundscapes, suburban visuals, and framed within a Sunni normative perspective. Such a comparative lens reveals discursive values and biases, encouraging self–reflection and awareness. Teachers must be mindful in selecting educational films and understand how they can be used to foster a more balanced perspective. This portrayal depicts Islam as 'asphalt Islam', emphasising its association with urban, marginalised settings and highlighting the importance of critical engagement with these educational materials.

Forfatterbiografi

Danial Ghasempour, Stockholm University

Danial Ghasempour is a PhD student in Religious Education at the Department of Teaching and Learning at Stockholm University. He is also affiliated with the National Graduate School of Islamic Studies. His research focuses on how Islam is portrayed in educational films and how these films are used in Swedish religious education.

Nedlastinger

Publisert

2026-03-20

Hvordan referere

Ghasempour, D. (2026). ’Asphalt Islam’ A Multimodal Comparative Analysis of Islam in Contrast to Christianity and Buddhism in Educational Films. Nordidactica. Journal of Humanities and Social Science Education, 16(2026:1), 29–56. https://doi.org/10.62902/nordidactica.v16i2026:1.27395