Articles
2018: Readership Course
Lessons of Feedback in Higher Education in Sweden: An interview-based investigation
- Peter Persson
- Stephen Marr
- Klas Hjort
- Arun Rana
- Alfredo Mendoza
-
Inskickad
-
18 oktober 2019
-
Publicerad
-
2018-04-12
Abstract
Lessons learned in the feedback process are as a two-sided coin that ultimately guide the PhD candidate towards becoming an independent researcher as well as educating “reader/docents” in their role as a supervisor. Building on a brief literature review, observations from 14 interviewed PhD candidates were reflected upon and these are the suggested lessons learned. The study’s preliminary findings suggest that feedback is most productive when it is organized, systematic, and tends to offer guidance rather than direct
instruction. Perhaps of greatest significance is the need to have consistent dialogue about the feedback’s form and content between student and supervisor(s).
Liknande artiklar
-
Nikolina Barchan,
Johanna Hjalte,
Nina Muratovska,
Elin Ossiansson,
Ingrid Ramm,
What is a good master thesis supervisor; and how can we become one?
,
Projekt- och konferensrapporter - CEE, LTH: 2020: Introduction to Teaching and Learning in Higher Education
-
Isabell Mitrovic,
Jimena Ortiz Sempértegui,
Julius Klemens Lorek,
Maja Sondell,
Medya Hatun Tanis,
Supervision of research projects during Ph.D. education: challenges and reflections
,
Projekt- och konferensrapporter - CEE, LTH: 2024: Introduction to Teaching and Learning in Higher Education
-
Johan Bonde,
Kenneth Frogner,
Johannes Hedman,
Oskar Larsson,
Javier Sotres,
Investigating the role of the assistant supervisor in PhD education
,
Projekt- och konferensrapporter - CEE, LTH: 2016: Readership Course
-
Daniel P Brink,
Sandy Chan,
Christian Nelson,
Maja Sidstedt,
Johannes Svensson,
The Development of Pedagogical Skills in PhD Candidates Through Supervision of Master Projects
,
Projekt- och konferensrapporter - CEE, LTH: 2016: Introduction to Teaching and Learning in Higher Education
-
Anna-Lena Sahlberg,
Luigi Nardi,
Marcus Runefors,
Per-Ivar Olsson,
Lars Ohlsson Fhager,
Can a PhD Student Fail?
,
Projekt- och konferensrapporter - CEE, LTH: 2021: Docent/Readership course
-
Pierre-Adrien Mante,
Erik Nilsson,
Claus Hedegaard Sørensen,
Supervisor feedback on co-authored papers: How to do it in an appropriate way?
,
Projekt- och konferensrapporter - CEE, LTH: 2021: Docent/Readership course
-
Per Becker,
Martin Bengtsson,
Daniel Nilsson,
Birgitta Nordquist,
Claes Thelander,
Zsuzsanna Toth-Szabo,
Approaches to doctoral supervision in relation to student expectations
,
Projekt- och konferensrapporter - CEE, LTH: 2010: Readership Course
-
Ingemar Bengtsson,
Joacim Lundberg,
Joakim Wernberg,
Interdisciplinary supervision: Neither, nor, or both?
,
Projekt- och konferensrapporter - CEE, LTH: 2022: Docent/Readership course
-
Silvia Arias,
Andreea Marcu,
Clemencio Nhantumbo,
Estevado Pondja,
Johan Rahm,
Navigating the relationship between the supervisor and the PhD student
,
Projekt- och konferensrapporter - CEE, LTH: 2015: Introduction to Teaching and Learning in Higher Education
-
Fahed Abou Nada,
Christian Grussler,
Usman Mazhar Mirza,
Hossein Sina,
Luyu Wang,
Communication between Educational and Industrial Enterprises: Industrial PhD Students, the Missing Link
,
Projekt- och konferensrapporter - CEE, LTH: 2013: Introduction to Teaching and Learning in Higher Education
1 2 > >>
Du kanske också starta en avancerad sökning efter liknande artiklar för den här artikeln.