Aceleași ape tulburi ale istoriei. Despre rinoceri și crocodili într-o lectură biopolitică

The same troubled waters of history: Rhinoceros and crocodiles in a biopolitical reading

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35824/sjrs.v9i1.28306

Keywords:

rhinoceros, crocodiles, ideological indoctrination, wooden language, propaganda

Abstract

In this article, we propose a comparative analysis of the political imaginary in Eugène Ionesco’s Rhinoceros and the (political) figures of crocodiles in Matei Vișniec’s The Moon’s Consulate or Adelina and the Swamp Crocodiles. Although the two playwrights employ animal metaphors (rhinoceroses and crocodiles) in different historical contexts, both authors mobilize literature, along with its political and social functions, to issue warnings against ideological indoctrination, political regimentation, and the growing threat of (post)modern dictatorships. As metaphors of ideological servility and of the (symbolic and political) metamorphosis of the individual, rhinoceroses and crocodiles signify forms of alienation, dissolution, and identity crisis under historical pressures. In light of the intensifying resurgence of political extremism, neo-Nazism, and neo-Legionarism in contemporary Romanian society, Vișniec offers a book for both children and adults that explores the mechanisms of ideological indoctrination, propaganda, and crocodilization as symptoms of dictatorship.

Author Biography

Mădălina Ceciuleac, Alexandru Ioan Cuza University of Iași, Romania

https://orcid.org/0009-0002-4609-4367

https://www.webofscience.com/wos/author/record/OZF-9794-2025

Mădălina Ceciuleac is a PhD student in Comparative Literature at Alexandru Ioan Cuza University, Faculty of Letters, Iași, Romania. Her research focuses on literary representations of totalitarianism, trauma, and war. She has published scholarly articles analyzing themes such as violences in wartime, political mythology in literature, and dramatic strategies in contemporary theater. Her work combines comparative literary analysis with interdisciplinary approaches to explore the socio-political and psychological dimensions of literature.

References

Arendt, H. (2014). Originile totalitarismului [The Origins of Totalitarianism]. (I. Dur, M. Ivănescu Trad.). Humanitas.

Balotă, N. (1971). Lupta cu absurdul [The fight against the absurd]. Univers.

Besançon, A. (1992). Confuzia limbilor [Confusion of languages]. (M. Antohi, S. Antohi, Trad.). Humanitas.

Canetti, E. (2000). Masele și puterea [Crowds and Power]. (A. Pavel, Trad.). Nemira.

Călinescu, M. (2006). Eugène Ionesco. Teme identitare și existențiale [Eugène Ionesco. Identity and existential themes]. Junimea.

Chira, R. G. (2021). Matei Vișniec – „Omul din care a fost extras răul”, o fabulă filosofică într-o ficțiune jurnalistică [Matei Vișniec – “The Evil-Free Man”, A Philosophical Fable In A Journalistic Fiction]. Incursiuni în imaginar, 1 (12), 13-32. https://doi.org/10.29302/InImag.2021.12.1

Crețu, B. (2005). Matei Vișniec, un optzecist atipic [Matei Vișniec, an Atypical ’80s Writer]. Editura Universității „Alexandru Ioan Cuza”.

Deleuze, G., Guattari, F. (1980). A Thousand Plateaus. Capitalism and Schizophrenia. (B. Massumi, Trad.). University of Minnesota Press.

Demény, P. (2025, May 30). M-am jucat serios cu toate genurile literare [I seriously experimented with all literary genres]. Matca literară. https://matcaliterara.ro/matei-visniec-m-am-jucat-serios-cu-toate-genurile-literare/.

Derrida, J. (2008). The Animal That Therefore I Am. (D. Wills, Trad.). Fordham University Press.

Derrida, J. (2009). The Beast and the Sovereign. (G. Bennington, Trad.). The University of Chicago Press.

Fischer-Lichte, E. (2008) The Transformative Power of Performance. (S. I. Jain, Trad.). Routledge.

Ionesco, E. (1992). Note și contranote [Notes and counter notes]. (I. Pop, Trad.). Humanitas.

Ionesco, E. (2017). Antidoturi [Antidotes]. (M. Dimov, Trad.). București.

Ionesco, E. (2017). Rinocerii [Rhinoceros]. În Teatru VI [Theater VI]. (V. Russo, V. Zografi, Trad.). Humanitas.

Joicaliuc, D. (2024, January 21). „Poezia a fost prima mea dragoste care s-a topit, apoi, în teatru” – Interviu cu poetul și dramaturgul Matei Vișniec [Poetry was my first love, which then melted into theatre]. Radio România Cultural. https://www.radioromaniacultural.ro/sectiuni-articole/literatura/poezia-a-fost-prima-mea-dragoste-care-s-a-topit-apoi-in-teatru-interviu-cu-poetul-si-dramaturgul-matei-visniec-id41740.html.

Mihalache, A. G. (2023). The Rhinoceros and The Regime Posthuman Bodies on Stage and Screen. Studia Universitatis Babes-Bolyai Dramatica, 68 (1), 87-102.

Ortiz-Robles, M. (2016). Literature and Animal Studies. Routledge.

Paleologu, Th. (2025). Patologiile puterii: gândurile unui covalescent [The Pathologies of Power: Thoughts of a Convalescent]. (I. Antoniu, Trad.). București: Trei.

Salzani, C. (2016). From Post-Human to Post-Animal: Posthumanism and the ‘Animal Turn’. Lo Sguardo: Rivista di Filosofia, 24 (II), 97-109.

Vișniec, M. (2014). Omul din care a fost extras răul [The Evil-Free Man]. Polirom.

Vișniec, M. (2022). Procesul comunismului prin teatru: Istoria comunismului povestită pentru bolnavii mintal, Richard al III-lea se interzice sau Scene din viața lui Meyerhold, Despre senzația de elasticitate când pășim peste cadavre [The History of Communism Told for the Mentally Ill, Richard III Is Banned or Scenes from the Life of Meyerhold, On the Feeling of Elasticity When Stepping Over Corpses]. Polirom.

Vișniec, M. (2025). Consulatul lunii sau Adelina și crocodilii din mlaștină [The Moon’s Consulate or Adelina and the Swamp Crocodiles]. Humanitas.

Downloads

Published

2026-05-15

How to Cite

Ceciuleac, M. (2026). Aceleași ape tulburi ale istoriei. Despre rinoceri și crocodili într-o lectură biopolitică : The same troubled waters of history: Rhinoceros and crocodiles in a biopolitical reading. Swedish Journal of Romanian Studies, 9(1), 127–140. https://doi.org/10.35824/sjrs.v9i1.28306