Articles
2021: Docent/Readership course
Research environment satisfaction and progress measures of a few industry PhD candidates
- Maria Elenius
- Sara Janhäll
- Olof Mundt Petersen
-
Submitted
-
July 20, 2024
-
Published
-
2024-07-20
Abstract
This report presents a limited investigation of the research and working environment for industry PhD students, and how this may relate to success measures defined here as completion according to plan and satisfaction with the post-graduation career. Possible differences in presumptions, conditions, limitations and possibilities in several different aspects between industry PhD students and PhD students employed at the university may cause different research- and working environments. The study was carried out by a survey employing a questionnaire or interviews based on the questionnaire and focused on factors such as working place, employer and progress together with the reactions to supervision and group of supervisors. The responders of the questionnaire and interviews were a limited number of industry PhDs who had completed, or were close to finishing, their PhD studies. In general, most of the responding PhDs were satisfied with their industry PhD program, and those with higher satisfaction of a number of working environment criteria, including supervision, tended to complete their studies within a shorter time frame. On the contrary, there was no clear correlation between the satisfaction of the post-graduation career and the satisfaction during the program. We also could not find a clear relation between the satisfaction of supervision and the co-location or not of student and adviser. Since the number of respondents unfortunately was rather limited it is not possible to make any statistically assured conclusions of the results.
Similar Articles
-
Isabell Mitrovic,
Jimena Ortiz Sempértegui,
Julius Klemens Lorek,
Maja Sondell,
Medya Hatun Tanis,
Supervision of research projects during Ph.D. education: challenges and reflections
,
Project and Conference Reports - CEE, LTH: 2024: Introduction to Teaching and Learning in Higher Education
-
Johan Axelsson,
Martina Maggio,
Maria Mondejar,
Romina Spalazzese,
Zan Wu,
Perspectives on Motivation in PhD Education and Supervision
,
Project and Conference Reports - CEE, LTH: 2015: Readership Course
-
Kimberly Nicholas,
Emily Baird,
Christian Brackman,
Barry Ness,
Simon Niedenthal,
Anna Torstensson,
Sofia Waldemarson,
Student preparedness in Ph.D. education - an assessment of supervisor and student perceptions of fulfilling Swedish third-cycle learning outcomes
,
Project and Conference Reports - CEE, LTH: 2013: Readership Course
-
Nicholas Rosenstock,
Jonas Ohlsson,
Flavius Gruian,
How can Swedish bachelor´s and master´s programs better prepare students for doctoral education?
,
Project and Conference Reports - CEE, LTH: 2014: Readership Course
-
Gudbjörg Erlingsdóttir,
Santosh Jagtap,
Adam Kristensson,
Martin Leijnse,
Some voices about being an international PHD student at LU
,
Project and Conference Reports - CEE, LTH: 2013: Readership Course
-
O. Alexanderson,
C. Dahlhammar,
G. Somesfalean,
L. Wang,
N. Wellander,
Graduate Student Emancipation: - an Investigation on Authorship and Paper Writing
,
Project and Conference Reports - CEE, LTH: 2010: Readership Course
-
Carina Geldhauser,
Andreas Langer,
Elena Pagnin,
Tony Stillfjord,
‘What happens next?’ Ph.D. Candidates’ and Supervisors’ Perspectives on Career Paths and Choices After the Defense
,
Project and Conference Reports - CEE, LTH: 2021: Docent/Readership course
-
Marlene Arens,
Motivation and Mentor - What helps doctoral students get off to a good start in applied research?
,
Project and Conference Reports - CEE, LTH: 2020: Docent/Readership course
-
Sebastian Lehmann,
Markus Nilsson,
Josefin Starkhammar,
Hope Witmer,
What motivates PhD students to start their studies and what keeps them motivated to continue?
,
Project and Conference Reports - CEE, LTH: 2016: Readership Course
You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.