The topology of the attic in the dramaturgy of H. Ibsen, F. Wedekind, and M. Sebastian

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35824/sjrs.v9i1.28783

Keywords:

the attic of the house , the garret , reverie , M. Sebastian , F. Wedekind , H. Ibsen

Abstract

An important topos of the imaginary and, implicitly, of literature, the attic of the house is a symbol within the major coordinate of space which, through its functional meanings, consciously or unconsciously guides the actions of characters. In order to approach the attic as a domestic space, we have drawn on the theoretical insights concerning interior space developed by Abraham Moles and Élisabeth A. Rohmer (1972), and especially on those offered by Gaston Bachelard in The Poetics of Space (1957/1963). Comparing the functions of the house built on the ground with those of the dwelling in an apartment block, Bachelard (1963, p. 26) proposes, for the drama of the “superimposed boxes,” the solution of reverie, more precisely “the metaphors of the ocean” (p. 28), a resolution that proves valid in a considerable number of literary works. It appears in Frank Wedekind’s Pandora’s Box (1904/1918), where the action of the final act takes place in the attic of an unconverted apartment building; through the two large windows, through which the sky should have been visible, the incessant drumming of rain penetrates, covering the city’s din and isolating the heroes who, each within his or her own interior space, are free to dream. In Henrik Ibsen’s The Wild Duck (1884/1900), the attic acquires a particular significance: it is an attic-forest that points toward the Bachelardian hut-house, where one feels removed from urban concerns and the bustle of the city, and where, within the realm of absolute imagination, human beings can remain young for a long time. Similarly, Mihail Sebastian’s Insula [The Island] (1947/1956) perfectly illustrates this type of reverie; a representative episode is the aspirin-induced intoxication of the three protagonists who live in a garret, on which occasion they imagine the ocean and an island, accompanied by a series of auditory elements that frame their reverie.

In the plays under analysis, the attic or garret represents rationality; it is the space in which the characters become aware of the true reality in which they live and, moreover, accept it while seeking solutions to overcome the impasses they face. It is the place where time is abolished and escapism becomes, for all of them, a therapy of the soul.

Author Biography

Gabriela Chiciudean, 1 Decembrie 1918 University of Alba Iulia, Romania

https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4544-410X

https://www.webofscience.com/wos/author/record/C-7457-2017

https://www.scopus.com/authid/detail.uri?authorId=57217030080

Gabriela Chiciudean, Associate Professor, PhD in Philology since 2005, teaches Theory of Literature, Literary Criticism, Introduction in the Science of Imaginary, Comparative Literature. She is the author of some individual volumes (Incursiuni în lumea simbolurilor, Sibiu, Imago Publishing House, 2004; Pavel Dan şi globul de cristal al creatorului, The Romanian Academy Publishing House, 2007; Obiectiv/ Subiectiv. Încercări de stabilizare a fluidului, Tipomoldova Publishing House, 2013; Studii literare. Abordări pe suportul Știintei imaginarului, The Romanian Academy Publishing House, 2016), and the co-author and coordinator of a few other volumes. She published many articles and studies in dedicated periodicals in Romania and abroad. She is the executive manager of Speculum Research Centre on the Imaginary, 1 Decembrie 1918 University of Alba Iulia. She is the organizer of Speculum Conferences and the editor of Incursiuni în Imaginar, the literary journal of Speculum Conferences, and editor of the Swedish Journal of Romanian Studies, Lund University, Sweden.

References

Anghelescu, A. (1978). Creaţie şi viaţă [Creation and Life]. Editura Eminescu.

Bachelard. G. (1963). The poetics of space (M. Jolas, Trans.). The Orion Press. (Original work published 1957)

Baudrillard, J. (1996a). Sistemul obiectelor [The system of objects] (H. Lazăr, Trans.). Editura Echinox. (Original work published 1968)

Baudrillard, J. (1996b). The system of objects (J. Benedict, Trans.). Verso. (Original work published 1904)

Cubleșan, C. (coord.), Bâgiu, L., Chiciudean, G., & Ghemeș, I. (2007). Mihail Sebastian, Teatru. Dicționar de personaje [Mihail Sebastian, Theater. Dictionary of Characters]. Hasefer.

Floria (Danciu), L. (2015). Mit, rit și simbol în travesti-ul postmodernist cărtărescian [Myth, ritual, and symbol in Cărtașian postmodernist travesty]. Incursiuni în Imaginar, 6, 105-120. https://doi.org/10.29302/InImag.2015.6.8

Georgescu, P. (1964). Păreri literare [Literary opinions]. EPL.

Ibsen, H. (1900). The wild duck: A drama in five acts (E. Marx Aveling, Trans.). Walter H. Baker & Co. (Original work published 1884)

Lévinas, E. (1979). Totality and infinity. An essay on exteriority (A. Lingis, Trans.). Martinus Nijhoff Publishers. (Original work published 1961)

Moles, A., & Rohmer, E. A. (1972). Psychologie de l’espace [The psychology of space]. Casterman.

Sebastian, M. (1956). Opere alese (Vol. I. Teatru) [Selected works, Vol. I., Theater]. ESPLA.

Wedekind, F. (1918). Pandora’s box: A tragedy in three acts. (S. A. Eliot, Jr., Trans.). Boni and Liveright. (Original work published 1904)

Downloads

Published

2026-05-15

How to Cite

Chiciudean, G. (2026). The topology of the attic in the dramaturgy of H. Ibsen, F. Wedekind, and M. Sebastian. Swedish Journal of Romanian Studies, 9(1), 189–197. https://doi.org/10.35824/sjrs.v9i1.28783