Return rates of nest-box breeding Pied Flycatchers Ficedula hypoleuca to their breeding site in subalpine birch forest in Swedish Lapland, during 1965–2018

N Erik I Nyholm

doi:10.34080/os.v29.20019

Authors

N Erik I Nyholm Department of Ecology and Environmental Science, Umeå university

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.34080/os.v29.20019

Keywords:

predation, breeding success, site fidelity, survival, passerine

Abstract

Return rates of 4,178 female and 1,565 male breeding Pied Flycatchers ringed in 1965–2017 were studied near the species’ upper elevation and climatic limit in northern Sweden. Female return rate was 7.5% in the season subsequent to the first breeding season. Having returned once, 37% continued to return the next three seasons. Corresponding return rates of males were 27% and 39%. Female return rate decreased with more than 30% during the study period whereas that of males did not decrease. This difference was probably due to increased mortality during the non-breeding season that selectively struck females after the 1970s. Local factors affected return rates in both sexes. Return rate was positively correlated with breeding success in females but negatively in males, whereas it was correlated with nest-predation in the opposite way. Predation by mustelids accounted for a significant part of female return rate. Females that had returned once were continuously faithful to the former breeding site. Males showed faithfulness only after having returned twice.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Askenmo C. 1979. Reproductive effort and return rate of male Pied Flycatchers. American Naturalist 114: 748–753. https://doi.org/10.1086/283523

Chernetsov N, Sokolov LV & Kosarev V. 2009. Local survival rates of Pied Flycatchers Ficedula hypoleuca depend on their immigrant status. Avian Ecology and Behaviour 16: 11–20.

Enemar A, Sjöstrand B, Andersson G & von Proschwitz T. 2004. The 37-year dynamics of a subalpine passerine community, with special emphasis on the influence of environmental temperature and Epirrita autmnalis cycles. Ornis Svecica 14: 63–106. https://doi.org/10.34080/os.v14.20236

Haartman L von. 1951. Der Trauerschnäpper. II Populationsprobleme. Acta Zoologica Fennica Vol. 67.

Järvinen A. 1993. Spatial and temporal variation in reproductive trait of adjacent northern Pied Flycatcher Ficedula hypoleuca populations. Ornis Scandinavica 24: 33–40. https://doi.org/10.2307/3676407

Kern M, Slater F & Cowie R. 2014. Return rate and dispersal distances of Welsh Pied Flycatchers Ficedula hypoleuca and that influence them. Ringing & Migration, 29: 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1080/03078698.2014.932617

Leivits A & Vilbaste H. 1990. Breeding area fidelity and natal dipersal of the Pied Flycatcher in south-west Estonia. In Viksne J & Vilks J. (eds): Baltic Birds 5. Proceeding of the fifth conference on the study and conservation of migratory birds of the Baltic Basin 1: 254–257.

Lundberg A & Alatalo RV. 1992. The Pied Flycatcher. T & AD Poyser, London.

Nilsson J-E. 2008. A 20-year study of a nest box breeding bird population with special regard to the Pied Flycatcher Ficedula hypoleuca. Ornis Svecica 18: 52–64. https://doi.org/10.34080/os.v18.20235

Nyholm NEI. 1984. Polygyny in the Pied Flycatcher Ficedula hypoleuca at Ammarnäs, Swedish Lapland. Annales Zoologici Fennici 21: 229–232.

Nyholm NEI. 1986. Birth area fidelity and age of first breeding in a northern population of Pied Flycatcher Ficedula hypoleuca. Ornis Scandinavica 17: 249–252. https://doi.org/10.2307/3676834

Nyholm NEI. 2011. Dynamics and reproduction of a nest box breeding population of Pied Flycatchers Ficedula hypoleuca in a subalpine birch forest in Swedish Lapland during a period of 46 years. Ornis Svecica 21: 133–156. https://doi.org/10.34080/os.v21.20232

Nyholm NEI. & Myhrberg H. 1983. Breeding area fidelity of the Pied Flycatcher Ficedula hypoleuca at Ammarnäs, Swedish Lapland. Ornis Fennica 60: 22–27.

Sanz JJ. 2001. Latitudinal variation in female local return rate in the philopatric Pied Flycatcher (Ficedula hypoleuca). Auk 118: 539–543. https://doi.org/10.2307/4089818

Winkel W. 1982. Zum Ortsteue-verhalten des Trauerschnäppers (Ficedula hypoleuca) im westlichen Randbereich seines mitteleuropäischen Verbreitungsgebietes. Journal für Ornithologie. 123: 155–173. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01645055