Teologisk etik för livets slutskede. Om palliativ sedering
AbstractThe article discusses theological arguments for and against palliative sedation, such as arguments based on the distinction between ordinary and extra-ordinary means and arguments based on the conceptions of “playing God” and human beings as created co-creators. It argues that palliative sedation can be theologically justified. Furthermore, the article examines two concepts of death: the heart-lung death concept and the whole-brain death concept. In the state New Jersey, USA, the New Jersey Death Definition Law gives ‘religious beliefs’ as a reason why individuals should be allowed to choose between being declared dead upon the basis of heart-lung death criteria or wholebrain death criteria. Religious and/or cultural understandings of death also play a role in the Japanese Transplantation Law. In some cases, what concept of death one adheres to will matter for the discussion of palliative sedation.
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication, with the work 6 (six) months after publication simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.