Exploring out-of-class contexts in EFL learning: Romanian high school students' perspectives and practices
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35824/sjrs.v8i2.27674Keywords:
Out-of-class contexts, English as a Foreign Language, High school students, Informal language learning, Personal learning ecologies, Communicative language teachingAbstract
This study explores the role of out-of-class contexts (OOCCs) in English as a Foreign Language (EFL) learning among Romanian high school students, emphasizing how informal environments complement formal instruction. Data from 125 students across four public schools reveals active engagement with English through media consumption, gaming, and social media, enhancing vocabulary, listening comprehension, and speaking confidence. Informal settings provide low-anxiety opportunities for meaningful communication and experimentation. Motivation plays a pivotal role, with students linking English proficiency to future opportunities. Personal learning ecologies, such as online reading and conversations with others, foster development within supportive spaces. The study advocates integrating OOCCs into formal instruction to bridge theoretical and practical knowledge, creating a holistic learning environment aligned with learners’ interests and real-world needs.
References
Barker, D. (2004). The social context of language learning: A study of attitudes and motivation in second language acquisition.
Benson, P. (2011). Teaching and researching autonomy in language learning. London: Routledge.
Bialystok, E. (1994). Analysis and control in the development of second language proficiency. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 16(2), 157–168.
Cabot, H. (2016). ‘Refugee Vvices’: Tragedy, ghosts, and the anthropology of not knowing. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 45(6), 645-672.
Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2017). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications.
Dörnyei, Z. (2001). Motivational strategies in the language classroom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ellis, R. (1994). The study of second language acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Gass, S. M., (1997). Input, interaction, and the second language learner. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Hyland, K. (2004). Genre and second language writing. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Igoudin, L. (2013). Social identity and language learning motivation: Exploring the connection and activating learning. International perspectives on motivation (pp. 192-214). London: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI: https://10.1057/9781137000873_11
Kitchakarn, O. (2016). How students perceived social media as a learning tool in enhancing their language learning performance. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 15(4), 53-60.
Krashen, S. (1985). The input hypothesis: Issues and implications. London: Longman.
Lomicka, L., & Lord, G. (2009). The next generation: Social networking and online collaboration in foreign language learning. CALICO Journal, 26(2), 371-397.
Long, M. H. (1996). The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition. In W. C. Ritchie & T. K. Bhatia (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 413–468). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Meștereagă, E. (2021). The role of out-of-class contexts in EFL learning. Timișoara: Editura Universității de Vest.
Norton, B. (1995). Social identity, investment, and language learning. TESOL Quarterly, 29(1), 9-31.
Norton, B., & Toohey, K. (2011). Identity, language learning, and social change. Language Teaching, 44(4), 412-446.
Nunan, D. (1989). Designing tasks for the communicative classroom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Richards, J. C. (2015). Key issues in language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Sundqvist, P. (2009). Extramural English matters: Out-of-School English and its impact on Swedish ninth graders’ oral proficiency and vocabulary. [Doctoral dissertation, Karlstad University].
Sundqvist, P., & Sylvén, L. K. (2016). Extramural English in teaching and learning: From theory and research to practice. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Swain, M. (1985). Communicative competence: Some roles of comprehensible input and comprehensible output in its development. In S. Gass & C. Madden (Eds.), Input in second language acquisition (pp. 235–253). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
Toma, A. & D. Dejica. (2023). Mental translation and its contribution to communicative language teaching and learning. Professional Communication and Translation Studies, 16 / 2023, 120-126. Timisoara: Editura Politehnica.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Wisdom, J., & Creswell, J. W. (2013). Mixed methods: Integrating quantitative and qualitative data collection and analysis while studying patient-centered medical home models. PCMH Research Methods Series 13, 1-5. Rockville: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.
Zhou, Y. (2021). Impacts of social media on language learning: A review of literature. Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Humanities Education and Social Sciences (ICHESS 2021).
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Daniel Dejica, Elena Meștereagă
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
a. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
b. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
c. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
