Small religious images as instruments of social interaction. An analysis of holy cards based on a Căpleni collection
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35824/sjrs.v8i2.27412Keywords:
holy cards, interpersonal relationships, object biographies, religious images, social objectsAbstract
This study analyzes a collection of 245 small holy cards preserved in a private collection in Căpleni (Romania). The primary aim is to explore the origins, functions, and connections of these holy cards with local religious societies. By focusing on the personal inscriptions and messages on these images, the research seeks to uncover how they were used and how they contributed to shaping interpersonal relationships. The methodology involves categorizing the items based on their usage occasions and the nature of their inscriptions, prioritizing qualitative aspects. The study employs theoretical frameworks such as the concepts of social objects and object biographies, to interpret the functions and social significance of the images. The findings reveal that these small religious images served not only devotional purposes but also acted as social catalysts that facilitated the maintenance and reinforcement of relationships within the community. The gifting and exchange of holy cards were embedded in social interactions, often accompanied by personal messages that documented and strengthened social bonds. These practices contributed to the reproduction of social capital by continuously reaffirming mutual recognition and obligations among community members. In conclusion, the study highlights the multifaceted roles of small devotional images as instruments of both personal piety and social connectivity. The analysis underscores the importance of considering the social life of objects to fully appreciate their cultural and anthropological significance within a given community.
References
Asl, H. Z., Iera, A., Atzori, L., & Morabito, G. (2013). How often social objects meet each other? Analysis of the properties of a social network of IoT devices based on real data. 2013 IEEE Global Communications Conference (GLOBECOM), Atlanta, GA, USA, 2804–2809. DOI: 10.1109/GLOCOM.2013.6831499.
Bourdieu, P. (1997). Gazdasági tőke, kulturális tőke, társadalmi tőke [Economic capital, cultural capital, social capital]. In R. Angelusz (Ed.), A társadalmi rétegződés komponensei [Components of social stratification] 156–178. Budapest: Új Mandátum.
Cecchin, R. S. (2023). The contribution of Fr. Leonardo Maria Bello to mariology. Ecce Mater Tua: A Journal of Mariology Vol. 7, 76-100.
Csilléri K. (1991). Képek a sarokban [Pictures in the corner]. In E. S. Laczkovits (Ed.), Népi vallásosság a kárpát-medencében I [Popular religiosity in the Carpathian Basin I] 30-43. Veszprém: VEAB Néprajzi Munkabizottsága – Caritas Transsylvania.
Csukovits A. (2018). A népi vallásosság tárgyai megőrzésének jelentősége [The importance of preserving objects of popular religiosity]. Honsmeret, 46(4), 20-25.
Diós, I. (Ed.), & Viczián, J. (Ed.). (2007). Magyar katolikus lexikon XII. (Seq–Szentl) [Hungarian Catholic Encyclopedia XII. (Seq–Szentl)]. Budapest: Szent István Társulat.
https://lexikon.katolikus.hu/S/Szent%20Bonaventura%20Könyvnyomda.html (15. 11. 2024)
Epstein, B. (2014). Social objects without intentions. In A. Konzelmann Ziv & H. B. Schmid (Eds.), Institutions, emotions, and group agents: Contributions to social ontology (pp. 53–68). New York: Springer.
Fejős, Z. (2013). Az évszázad és az én világa: Diskurzusok az “egy tárgy” muzeográfiájában [The century and the world of the self: Discourses in the museography of “one object”]. Néprajzi Látóhatár, 22(2), 32–65.
George, D., & Salvatori, M. R. (2008). Holy cards / Immaginette: The extraordinary literacy of vernacular religion. College Composition and Communication, 60(2), 250-284.
Ilyés, Cs., (Ed.). (2006). A Szatmári Egyházmegye Sematizmusa [The sematism of the Diocese of Satu Mare]. Szatmárnémeti: Szatmári Római Katolikus Püspökség.
Knapp É., & Tüskés, G. (2004). Populáris grafika a 17-18. században [Popular graphics in the 17th-18th centuries]. Budapest: Balassi
Kopytoff, I. (1986). The cultural biography of things. In A. Appadurai (Ed.), The social life of things: Commodities in cultural perspective (pp. 64–91). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kós, K. (1994). A népi ikonkészítés műhelyei a Mezőségen [The workshops of folk icon making in the Câmpia Transilvaniei]. In E. Zakariás & V. Keszeg (Eds.), Yearbook of the Kriza János Ethnographic Society 2., 198–210. Cluj Napoca: Kriza János Ethnographic Society.
Mauss, M. (2002). The gift: The form and reason for exchange in archaic societies (W. D. Halls, Trans.). London: Routledge.
Mohay T. (2009). A csíksomlyói pünkösdi búcsújárás: Történet, eredet, hagyomány [The Pentecostal pilgrimage to Csíksomlyó: History, origin, tradition]. Budapest: Nyitott Könyv − L’Harmattan.
Mojzer M. (1997). A festő hagyatéka, ahogyan ma látjuk [The painter’s legacy as we see it today]. In Á. Mikó & Gy. Poszler (Eds.), “Magnificat anima mea Dominum” MS Mester Vizitáció-képe és az egykori selmecbányai főoltára [MS Master’s Visitation picture and the former main altar of Selmecbánya] (pp. 9-25). Budapest: Magyar Nemzeti Galéria
Passinsky, A. (2021). Norm and object: A normative hylomorphic theory of social objects. https://philpapers.org/archive/PASNAO.pdf (10. 09. 2024)
S. Laczkovits E. (1991). Vallásos ábrázolások és feliratok a Közép-Dunántúli paraszti kultúrában [Religious depictions and inscriptions in the peasant culture of Central Transdanubia]. In E. S. Laczkovits (Ed.), Népi vallásosság a kárpát-medencében I [Popular religiosity in the Carpathian Basin I] (pp. 44-66). Veszprém: VEAB Néprajzi Munkabizottsága – Caritas Transsylvania
Simon, N. (2010). The participatory museum. Museum 2.0. https://participatorymuseum.org/chapter4/ (09. 09. 2024)
Szacsvay É. (2000). Egyházi gyűjtemény [Ecclesiastical Collection]. In Fejős Zoltán (Ed.), A Néprajzi Múzeum gyűjteményei [The Collections of the Museum of Ethnography] (pp. 403–432). Budapest: Néprajzi Múzeum.
Szikszai M. (2013). Vallásos társulati élet egy szatmári sváb faluban [Catholic religious societies in a Swabian village in Satu Mare]. In E. Egyed, L. Pakó, & A. Weisz (Eds.), Certamen I: Előadások a Magyar Tudomány Napján [Certamen I: Lectures on the Hungarian Science Day] (pp. 145-156). Cluj Napoca: Societatea Muzeului Ardelean.
Szikszai M. (2020). Letűnt világok antropológiája és a megismerhetetlen különös szépsége: Szociális kapcsolatháló és kulturális gyakorlat az írógép korszakában [Anthropology of lost worlds and the peculiar beauty of the unknowable: Social networks and cultural practices in the age of the typewriter]. Cluj Napoca: Societatea Muzeului Ardelean.
Szikszai M. (2023). Community networks and cultural practices in twentieth-century Romania: Paper-based cultures in the writings of a Catholic priest. Lanham – Boulder – New York – London: Lexington Books.
Szilárdfy Z. (1995). A magánáhítat szentképei a szerző gyűjteményéből I: 17-18. század [The private devotion holy cards from the author’s collection I: 17th-18th centuries]. Szeged: JATE Néprajzi Tanszék.
Szilárdfy Z. (1997). A magánáhítat szentképei a szerző gyűjteményéből II: 19-20. század [The private devotion holy cards from the author’s collection II: 19th-20th centuries]. Szeged: JATE Néprajzi Tanszék.
Vass E. (2010). A búcsú és a búcsújárás mint rituális dráma [Pilgrimage and the indulgence as a ritual drama]. Budapest: Lexika Kiadó − MTA Könyvtára.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Mária Szikszai
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
a. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
b. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
c. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
