Rethinking fieldwork: researching food in the aftermath of lockdown

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35824/sjrs.v7i1.25984

Keywords:

Romanian ethnology, Romanian Food Heritage, field research, Banat, ethnology in time of crisis

Abstract

The article raises questions related to field research methodology in a specific context. The authors take into consideration mainly the context of uncertainty, generated by Covid-19 pandemics which forced them to reshape the field research methodology as previously known and commonly used by Romanian ethnologists. The authors provide a brief presentation and analysis of the first steps done as part of what later would become a larger field experience in terms of investigating Romanian food heritage. It relies on five examples represented by five interviews conducted during the Covid-19 pandemic. The interviews that compose the case study have a special value. The negotiation to set up the meetings, the arguments of each of the parties, the conditions in which the discussions were organized are all angles that deserve to be discussed as source of what we might call ethnological motivation. What can determine the people, members of a specific culture, to share their knowledge and their life experience about a certain topic, when the very act of speaking might be a dangerous one? In each of these examples, the informant was responsive when informed that we were conducting research related to local traditions, specific family cuisine, without producing television shows, and without overexposing themselves. We notice the existence of a need to tell, a real duty to tell relevant information about one’s own culture, a vector that characterizes communities just as, for the researcher, there is a work ethic which implies his obligation to make all necessary efforts to find out information.

 

Author Biographies

Diana Mihuț, West University of Timișoara, Romania

Diana Mihuț, is a Research Assistant within the Department of Romanian Studies at the West University of Timișoara and a member of the Research Center for Heritage and Cultural Anthropology (RHeA) research group. She has carried out field research in rural communities from the cross-border Banat region, with a focus on regional intangible heritage and its capitalization. Since 2020 she has been part of the research team that conducted research on specific Romanian food heritage.

Otilia Hedeșan, West University of Timisoara, Romania

Otilia Hedeșan, Romanian ethnologist, professor of Romanian Culture and Civilization at the West University of Timișoara and the head of the Research Center for Heritage and Cultural Anthropology (RHeA). She has extensive experience in leading research teams in the field of intangible cultural heritage. In this regard, she has overseen field research campaigns in various countries in Eastern Europe, including Romania, Bulgaria, Croatia, Hungary, Moldova, Serbia, and Ukraine. Her primary research interests include everyday life in multi-ethnic communities, folklore and mythology, storytelling and narrative genres, and food heritage.

References

Hedeșan, O. (2008). Doing Fieldwork in Communist Romania. In V. Mihăilescu, I. Iliev, & S. Naumović (Eds.), Studying Peoples in the People's Democracies, II Socialist Era Anthropology in South-East Europe (pp. 21-39). Berlin: LIT Verlag.

Hedeșan, O. (2015). Luai Uzdinu de-amăruntul. Amintirile unei povestitoare prodigioase: Mărioara Sârbu / I looked at Uzdin in details: The memoirs of a prodigious storyteller: Mărioara Sârbu. Timișoara: Editura Universității de Vest.

Hedeșan, O. & Timoce-Mocanu, C. (2023). Réinventer le terrain ethnologique dans le contexte de la pandémie de covid-19 / Reinventing the ethnological field in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic. Transilvania, 11-12, 109-117. DOI: https://doi.org/10.51391/trva.2022.03.06

Hedeșan, O., & Timoce-Mocanu, C. (Eds.). (2021). Multivalent Research about Food. Building the Romanian File. Transylvanian Review, XXX(2).

Institutul Social Banat-Crișana. (1938). Ancheta monografică în comuna Belinț / Monographic research of the village of Belinț. Timișoara: Tipografia Românească Timișoara.

Institutul Social Banat-Crișana. (1939). Monografia comunei Sârbova / The Monograph of Sârbova village. Timișoara: Tipografia Românească Timișoara.

Kilani, M. (1987). L’anthropologie du terrain et le terrain de l’anthropologie: Observation, description et textualisation en anthropologie / The anthropology of the field and the field of anthropology : Observation, description, and textualization in anthropology. Réseaux, Communication – Technologie – Société, 27, 39–78. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3406/reso.1987.1321

Kilani, M. (1994). Du terrain au texte, Sur l’écriture en anthropologie / From field to text, on writing in anthropology. Communications, 58, 45–60. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3406/comm.1994.1878

Mihuț, D. (2023). Dulciuri tradiționale bănățene: Contexte ale unei documentări de teren / Traditional sweets from Banat: Contexts of field research. In M. Ćorković, M. Huțanu, M. Dan, & M. Trajlović-Kondan (Eds.), Limba, Literatura și Cultura Română: Provocări și Perspective (pp.187-200) Belgrade: Faculty of Philology.

Rostás, Z. (2003). Sala luminoasă: Primii monografiști ai școlii gustiene / The Bright Room. The first monographers of Gusti’s School. București: Paideia.

Todorov,T. (1978). Poétique de la prose (choix) suivi de Nouvelles recherches sur le récit / Poetic of prose (selection) followed by new Research on narrative. Paris : Éditions du Seuil.

Downloads

Published

2024-05-15

How to Cite

Mihuț, D., & Hedeșan, O. (2024). Rethinking fieldwork: researching food in the aftermath of lockdown. Swedish Journal of Romanian Studies, 7(1), 139–150. https://doi.org/10.35824/sjrs.v7i1.25984