Return to the Real, Part II
Cultural Feedback Loops in Psychoactive Drug Experiences
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31156/jaex.28223Keywords:
psychedelics, Western cultureAbstract
Having identified a typically Modernist view of what (psychedelic) drugs “do” in “Return to the Real, Part I,” this follow-up article discusses some of the implications of this observation for drug studies in general and for the notion of set and setting in particular. A fourfold diagram is proposed in which the cultural set and setting, the individual set and setting, the drug experience, and its articulation back into culture, are seen as interconnected elements of a feedback loop. Different processes within this loop are described and illustrated with historical examples. Since the main effect of (psychedelic) drugs is to amplify, it follows that their use tends to reinforce prior beliefs. And since feedback loops are by definition cyclical and repetitive, their effect on a sociocultural level would have to be conservative too. On this level, transformative effects are rather due to impactful articulations of drug experiences in receptive environments. Finally, this paper suggests that drug studies require a minimal knowledge of cultural history.
References
Abrams, M. H. (1971). The milk of paradise: The effect of opium visions on the works of De Quincey, Crabbe, Francis Thompson, and Coleridge. Harper & Row. (Original work published 1934) https://archive.org/details/milkofparadiseef0000abra/page/n5/mode/2up
Baudelaire, Ch. (1961). Les paradis artificiels [Artificial paradises] (Cl. Pichois, Ed.). Gallimard. (Original work published 1860)
Baumeister, R. F. & Placidi, K. S (1983). A social history and analysis of the LSD controversy. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 23(4), 25-58. https://bibliography.maps.org/bibliography/default/resource/12810
Becker, H. S. (1953). Becoming a marihuana user. The American Journal of Sociology, 59(3), 235-242. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2771989
Beringer, K. (1927). Der Meskalinrausch [The mescalin intoxication]. Springer.
Bunce, R. (1979). Social and political sources of drug effects: The case of bad trips on psychedelics. Journal of Drug Issues, 9(2), 213-233. https://doi.org/10.1177/002204267900900207
Carhart-Harris, R. L., Kaelen, M., Whalley, M. G., Bolstridge, M., Feilding, A., & Nutt, D. (2015). LSD enhances suggestibility in healthy volunteers. Psychopharmacology, 232, 785-794. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00213-014-3714-z
Cohen, S. (1965). Drugs of hallucination. Secker & Warburg. (Original work published as The beyond within: The LSD story, in 1964)
De Liedekerke, A. (1984). La belle époque de l’opium [The belle époque of opium]. Éditions de la différence.
De Quincey, Th. (1971). Confessions of an English opium eater. Penguin. (Original work published 1821)
Dobkin de Rios, M. (1984). Hallucinogens: Cross-cultural perspectives. University of New Mexico Press. https://archive.org/details/hallucinogenscro0000dobk/page/n5/mode/2up
Dupuis D. & Veissière S. (2022). Culture, context, and ethics in the therapeutic use of hallucinogens: Psychedelics as active super-placebos? Transcultural Psychiatry, 59(5), 571-578. doi:10.1177/13634615221131465
Gombrich, E. H. (1991). Art and illusion. Phaidon. (Original work published 1960)
Gordon Wasson, R. (1957). Seeking the magic mushroom. Life, 49(19), 100-102, 109-120. https://books.google.nl/books?id=Jj8EAAAAMBAJ&lpg=PA100&hl=nl&pg=PA100#v=onepage&q&f=false
Grinspoon, L. & Bakalar, J. B. (1979). Psychedelic drugs reconsidered. Basic Books. https://archive.org/details/psychedelicdrugs0000grin_s9r2
Grof, S. (1976). Realms of the human unconscious: Observations from LSD research. Dutton.
Haynes-Curtis, C. (1995). Sartre and the drug connection. Philosophy, 70(271), 87-106. https://www.jstor.org/stable/3751588
Hayter, A. (1968). Opium and the romantic imagination. Faber and Faber.
Hartmann, R. (1974). Malerei aus Bereichen des Unbewussten: Künstler experimentieren unter LSD [Painting from realms of the unconscious: Artists experiment under LSD]. DuMont Schauberg.
Hartogsohn, I. (2017). Constructing drug effects: A history of set and setting. Drug Science, Policy and Law, 3(0), 1-17. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/2050324516683325
Hartogsohn, I. (2018). The meaning-enhancement properties of psychedelics and their mediator role in psychedelic therapy, spirituality, and creativity. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 12(129), 1-5. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2018.00129
Hartogsohn, I. (2020). American trip: Set, setting, and the psychedelic experience in the twentieth century. MIT Press.
Huxley, A. (1945). The perennial philosophy. Harper & Brothers.
Huxley, A. (1954). The doors of perception. Chatto & Windus.
Isaacson, J. (1994). Constable, Duranty, Mallarmé, impressionism, plein air, and forgetting. The Art Bulletin, 74(3), 427-450. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/epdf/10.1080/00043079.1994.10786596
James, W. (1985). The varieties of religious experience. Penguin. (Original work published 1902)
Jantzen, G. M. (1995). Power, gender and Christian mysticism. Cambridge University Press.
Janz, B. (1995). Mysticism and understanding: Steven Katz and his critics. Studies in Religion, 24(1), 77-94.
Jay, M. (2023). Psychonauts: Drugs and the making of the modern mind. Yale University Press.
Katz, S. T. (1978). Language, epistemology, and mysticism. In S. T. Katz (Ed.), Mysticism and philosophical analysis (pp. 22-74). Sheldon Press. https://archive.org/details/mysticismphiloso0000unse
Katz, S. T. (1983). The “conservative” character of mysticism. In S. T. Katz (Ed.), Mysticism and religious traditions (pp. 3-60). Oxford University Press.
Kris, E. (1964). Psychoanalytic explorations in art. Schocken Books. (Original work published 1952)
Leary, T. & Alpert, R. (1962). Foreword. In A. W. Watts, The joyous cosmology (pp. ix-xv). Vintage.
Leary, T., Metzner, R. & Alpert, R. (1964). The psychedelic experience: A manual based on the Tibetan Book of the Dead. University Books.
Leary, T. (1966). How to change behavior. In D. Solomon (Ed.), LSD: The consciousness-expanding drug (pp. 103-118). Putnam’s. (Original work published 1962)
Lee, M. A. & Shlain, B. (1992). Acid dreams: The complete social history of LSD: The CIA, the sixties, and beyond. Grove Press. (Original work published 1985)
LeVine, R. A. (1973). Culture, behavior, and personality. Aldine.
LeVine, R. A. (2001). Culture and personality studies, 1918-1960: Myth and history. Journal of Personality, 69(6), 803-818. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6494.696165
Lou, L. (2018). Artists’ innocent eye as extended proximal mode of vision. Art & Perception, 6(1), 1-40. https://brill.com/view/journals/artp/6/1/article-p1_1.xml
Lovejoy, A. O. (1974). The great chain of being: A study of the history of an idea. Harvard University Press. (Original work published 1936)
Lowes, J. L. (1927). The road to Xanadu: A study in the ways of the imagination. Constable.
MacAndrew, C. & Edgerton, R. B. (1969). Drunken comportment: A social explanation. Aldine.
Marks, J. (1991). The search for the “Manchurian candidate”: The CIA and mind control. Norton. (Original work published 1979)
Masters, R. E. L. & Houston, J. (1966). The varieties of psychedelic experience. Turnstone Books.
Mickel, E. J. (1969). The artificial paradises in French literature I: The influence of opium and hashish on the literature of French romanticism and ‘Les fleurs du mal’. University of North Carolina Press.
Novak, S. J. (1997). LSD before Leary: Sidney Cohen’s critique of 1950s psychedelic drug research. Isis, 88(1), 87-110. https://www.jstor.org/stable/235827
Pace, B. A. & Devenot, N. (2021). Right-wing psychedelia: Case studies in cultural plasticity and political pluripotency. Frontiers in Psychology, 12(733185), 1-21. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.733185
Piper, A. (2015). Strange drugs make for strange bedfellows: Ernst Junger, Albert Hofmann and the politics of psychedelics. CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform.
Rosen, M. G. (2013). What I make up when I wake up: Anti-experience views and narrative fabrication of dreams. Frontiers in Psychology, 4 (514), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00514
Röske, Th. (1995). Der Arzt als Künstler: Ästhetik und Psychotherapie bei Hans Prinzhorn (1886-1933) [The doctor as artist: Aesthetics and psychotherapy with Hans Prinzhorn (1886-1933)]. Aisthesis Verlag.
Steer, J. (1989). Art history and direct perception: A general view. Art History, 19(1), 93-108. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8365.1989.tb00338.x
Stevens, J. (1987). Storming heaven: LSD and the American dream. Atlantic Monthly Press.
Ten Berge, J. (2004). The belle epoque of opium. In S. L. Gilman & Z. Kun (Eds). Smoke: A global history of smoking (pp. 108-117). Reaktion Books.
Ten Berge, J. (2025). Return to the real, part I: Tracing a modernist set and setting in psychoactive drug experiences. Journal of Anomalous Experience and Cognition, 5(2), xx
Toy, E. (1980). The conservative connection: The chairman of the board took LSD before Timothy Leary. American Studies, 21(2), 65-77. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11614183/
Tuchman, M. (Ed.) (1986). The spiritual in art: Abstract painting 1890-1985. Abbeville Press.
Wallace, A. F. (1959). Cultural determinants of response to hallucinatory experience. Archives of General Psychiatry, 1(1), 58-69. https://bibliography.maps.org/bibliography/default/resource/16885
Yeats, W. B. (1961). Essays and introductions. Macmillan. https://archive.org/details/essaysintroducti00yeat/page/n5/mode/2up
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Jos ten Berge
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
All articles published in JAEX are open access, freely and universally accessible online, and archived in the open journal’s Lund University website (https://journals.lub.lu.se). Articles in JAEX can be distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License CCBY (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, with appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, a link to the Creative Commons license, and an indication if changes were made.
