Psychedelics as Non-Specific Amplifiers

Cultural Feedback Loops and Implications for Psychedelic Science. A Commentary on Return to the Real by Ten Berge

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31156/jaex.27866

Keywords:

Psychedelics, Cultural Feedback Loops, Set and setting, Chemiosocialities, Mystical experiences;, Reflexivity, Discourse analysis, Psychedelic neuroscience

Abstract

Return to the Real describes how culturally prevalent narratives shape psychedelic experience. Building on Ten Berge’s two-part analysis, our commentary argues that psychedelic effects are best understood within cultural feedback loops linking cultural set and setting, individual expectations, experience, and its articulation back into culture. On this view, psychedelics operate primarily as non-specific amplifiers and catalysts that magnify pre-existing beliefs, rather than revealing unmediated insights. We situate this thesis in relation to contemporary neuroscientific models of the psychedelic experience (CSTC, REBUS), humanistic and anthropological accounts, and evidence on socio-political belief change and clinical outcomes. We show how the apparent “disruptive” effects of psychedelics can often be reinterpreted as context-dependent intensifications. We then identify methodological and ideological obstacles to studying culture in psychedelic science and propose a mixed-methods program, including reflexivity, discourse analytics, neurophenomenology, and naturalistic cohort comparisons, to operationalize cultural variables. Recognizing culture’s constitutive role has ethical and epistemic consequences including caution with respect to metaphysical claims and  attention to how psychedelics induce change in clinical settings.  By bridging the humanities and cognitive neuroscience we can build a cumulative, culture-sensitive science of psychedelics.

References

Barad, K. (2007). Meeting the universe halfway: Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Duke university Press.

Bourdieu, P. (1977). Outline of a theory of practice (R. Nice, Trans.). Cambridge University Press.

Cardeña, E., & Pekala, R. J. (2014). Researching states of consciousness and anomalous experiences. In E. Cardeña, S. J. Lynn, & S. Krippner (Eds.), Varieties of anomalous experience: Examining the scientific evidence (2nd ed., pp. 21–56). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/14258-002

Chamberlain, K., McGuigan, K., Anstiss, D., & Marshall, K. (2018). A change of view: arts-based research and psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 15(2–3), 131–139. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2018.1456590

Devenot, N. (2023). TESCREAL hallucinations: Psychedelic and AI hype as inequality engines. Journal of Psychedelic Studies, 7(S1), 22-39. https://doi.org/10.1556/2054.2023.00292

Dupuis, D. (2022). The socialization of hallucinations: Cultural priors, social interactions, and contextual factors in the use of psychedelics. Transcultural Psychiatry, 59(5), 625-637. https://doi.org/10.1177/1363461521103638

Erritzoe, D., Roseman, L., Nour, M. M., MacLean, K., Kaelen, M., Nutt, D. J., & Carhart‐Harris, R. (2018). Effects of psilocybin therapy on personality structure. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 138(5), 368-378. https://doi.org/10.1111/acps.12904

Fiesler, C., & Proferes, N. (2018). “Participant” perceptions of Twitter research ethics. Social Media+ Society, 4(1), 2056305118763366. https://doi.org/10.1177/205630511876336

Forstmann, M., & Sagioglou, C. (2017). Lifetime experience with (classic) psychedelics predicts pro-environmental behavior through an increase in nature relatedness. Journal of Psychopharmacology, 31(8), 975-988. https://doi.org/10.1177/0269881117714049

Gao, C. X., Dwyer, D., Zhu, Y., Smith, C. L., Du, L., Filia, K. M., ... & Cotton, S. M. (2023). An overview of clustering methods with guidelines for application in mental health research. Psychiatry Research, 327, 115265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2023.115265

Gearin, A. K., & Devenot, N. (2021). Psychedelic medicalization, public discourse, and the morality of ego dissolution. International Journal of Cultural Studies, 24(6), 917-935. https://doi.org/10.1177/13678779211019424

Gier N (2014) The origins of religious violence: An Asian perspective. Lexington Books.

Graziosi, M., Singh, M., Nayak, S. M., & Yaden, D. B. (2023). Acute subjective effects of psychedelics within and beyond WEIRD contexts. Journal of Psychoactive Drugs, 55(5), 558-569. https://doi.org/10.1080/02791072.2023.2255274

Gupta, A. (2023). BERT for discourse analysis: A pragmatist approach to governmentality (Doctoral dissertation, University of Bristol).

Hall, E.T. (1973). The silent language. Anchor Books.

Hartogsohn, I. (2017). Constructing drug effects: A history of set and setting. Drug Science, Policy and Law, 3, 2050324516683325. https://doi.org/10.1177/2050324516683325

Hauskeller, C. (2022). Individualization and Alienation in Psychedelic Psychotherapy. In C. Hauskeller & P. Sjöstedt-Hughes (Eds.), Philosophy and psychedelics: Frameworks for exceptional experience. Bloomsbury Publishing.

Henrich, J., Heine, S. J., & Norenzayan, A. (2010). Beyond WEIRD: Towards a broad-based behavioral science. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 33(2-3), 111. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X10000725

Holm, S., Petersen, M. A., Enghoff, O., & Hesse, M. (2023). Psychedelic discourses: A qualitative study of discussions in a Danish online forum. International Journal of Drug Policy, 112, 103945. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugpo.2022.103945

Jamieson, M. K., Govaart, G. H., & Pownall, M. (2023). Reflexivity in quantitative research: A rationale and beginner's guide. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 17(4), e12735. https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12735

Kangaslampi, S. (2023). Association between mystical-type experiences under psychedelics and improvements in well-being or mental health–A comprehensive review of the evidence. Journal of Psychedelic Studies, 7(1), 18-28. https://doi.org/10.1556/2054.2023.00243

Kałużna, A., Schlosser, M., Gulliksen Craste, E., Stroud, J., & Cooke, J. (2022). Being no one, being One: The role of ego-dissolution and connectedness in the therapeutic effects of psychedelic experience. Journal of Psychedelic Studies. https://doi.org/10.1556/2054.2022.00199

Karhulahti V. M. (2024). Positionality statements in science. Open research Europe, 4, 62. https://doi.org/10.12688/openreseurope.17058.2

Langlitz, N., Dyck, E., Scheidegger, M., & Repantis, D. (2021). Moral psychopharmacology needs moral inquiry: The case of psychedelics. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 12, 680064. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2021.680064

Lyon, A. (2023). Psychedelic experience. Oxford University Press.

Margolin, I., Pearson, T., & Jones, A. (2024). Arts-based research in psychology: A means to unearth creative wisdom. Methods in Psychology, 11, 100144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.metip.2024.100144

Noorani, T., Bedi, G., & Muthukumaraswamy, S. (2023). Dark loops: Contagion effects, consistency and chemosocial matrices in psychedelic-assisted therapy trials. Psychological Medicine, 53(13), 5892-5901. doi:10.1017/S0033291723001289

Nour, M. M., Evans, L., Nutt, D., & Carhart-Harris, R. L. (2016). Ego-dissolution and psychedelics: Validation of the ego-dissolution inventory (EDI). Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 10, 190474. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2016.00269

Oram, M. (2018). The trials of psychedelic therapy: LSD psychotherapy in America. JHU Press.

Oswald, F. (2024). Positionality statements should not force us to ‘out’ourselves. Nature Human Behaviour, 8(2), 185-185. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-023-01812-5

Pace, B. A., & Devenot, N. (2021). Right-wing psychedelia: Case studies in cultural plasticity and political pluripotency. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 733185. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.733185

Sadowska, Z., (2023, April 20-22). Força (power) and ayahuasca multiplicity. [Conference presentation]. Breaking Convention 2023, Exeter, United Kingdom. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uMeeCbQYlk4

Safron, A., Juliani, A., Reggente, N., Klimaj, V., & Johnson, M. (2025). On the varieties of conscious experiences: Altered beliefs under psychedelics (ALBUS). Neuroscience of Consciousness, 2025(1), niae038. https://doi.org/10.1093/nc/niae038

Sanchez Petrement, M. (2023). Historicizing psychedelics: counterculture, renaissance, and the neoliberal matrix. Frontiers in Sociology, 8, 1114523. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsoc.2023.1114523

Savolainen, J., Casey, P. J., McBrayer, J. P., & Schwerdtle, P. N. (2023). Positionality and its problems: Questioning the value of reflexivity statements in research. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 18(6), 1331-1338. https://doi.org/10.1177/17456916221144988

Sopanen, J. (2022). Journeying in the realm of unconsciousness: Carl Jung’s Liber Novus and psychedelic experience. In C. Hauskeller & P. Sjöstedt-Hughes (Eds.), Philosophy and psychedelics: Frameworks for exceptional experience. Bloomsbury Publishing.

Timmermann, C., Kettner, H., Letheby, C., Roseman, L., Rosas, F. E., & Carhart-Harris, R. L. (2021). Psychedelics alter metaphysical beliefs. Scientific reports, 11(1), 22166. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-01209-2

Townsend, L., & Wallace, C. (2016). Social media research: A guide to ethics. The University of Aberdeen.

van Elk, M., & Fried, E. I. (2023). History repeating: Guidelines to address common problems in psychedelic science. Therapeutic Advances in Psychopharmacology, 13, 20451253231198466. https://doi.org/10.1177/20451253231198466

van Elk, M., & Yaden, D. B. (2022). Pharmacological, neural, and psychological mechanisms underlying psychedelics: A critical review. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 140, 104793. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2022.104793

Van Leeuwen, N., & van Elk, M. (2019). Seeking the supernatural: The interactive religious experience model. Religion, Brain & Behavior, 9(3), 221-251.

https://doi.org/10.1080/2153599X.2018.1453529

Victoria, B. D. (2022). Was D. T. Suzuki a Nazi sympathizer? In J. Breen, S. Fumihiko, & Y. Shōji (Eds.), Beyond Zen: D. T. Suzuki and the modern transformation of Buddhism (pp. 84–107). University of Hawai’i Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv270ktxr

Vollenweider, F. X., & Preller, K. H. (2020). Psychedelic drugs: Neurobiology and potential for treatment of psychiatric disorders. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 21(11), 611-624. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41583-020-0367-2)

Weiss, B., Sleep, C. E., Beller, N. M., Erritzoe, D., & Campbell, W. K. (2023). Perceptions of psychedelic personality change, determinants of use, setting and drug moderation: Toward a holistic model. Journal of Psychedelic Studies, 7(3), 200-226. https://doi.org/10.1556/2054.2023.00291

Xu, W. W., Tshimula, J. M., Dubé, È., Graham, J. E., Greyson, D., MacDonald, N. E., & Meyer, S. B. (2022). Unmasking the Twitter discourses on masks during the COVID-19 pandemic: User cluster–based BERT topic modeling approach. Jmir Infodemiology, 2(2), e41198. doi:10.2196/41198

Zembylas, M. (2025). Rethinking positionality statements in research: from looking back to building solidarity. International Journal of Research & Method in Education, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1080/1743727X.2025.2475762

Downloads

Published

2025-10-30

How to Cite

Ruban, A., & van Elk, M. (2025). Psychedelics as Non-Specific Amplifiers: Cultural Feedback Loops and Implications for Psychedelic Science. A Commentary on Return to the Real by Ten Berge. Journal of Anomalous Experience and Cognition, 5(2), 212–231. https://doi.org/10.31156/jaex.27866

Issue

Section

Theoretical and methodological papers