The Abstraction Matching Fallacy
A Procrustean Problem in the Science of Anomalous Experiences
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31156/jaex.27046Keywords:
anomalous experiences, methodological problems, ideological bias, explanatory models, reductionism, physicalism, phenomenology, materialismAbstract
The currently expanding science of anomalous experiences is unique, in the sense that it necessarily sits at the treacherous borderlands between the often-opposed ontologies of religion/spirituality and secular physicalism. As might be expected in such an inherently charged position, the scientific study of the hallucinatory neurobiological underpinnings of these experiences has resulted in the emergence of certain biased practices, of which the Abstraction Matching Fallacy is a prominent example. This methodological fallacy involves, on the basis of resemblance, using known hallucinatory phenomena as explanations for what are widely considered to be spiritual experiences, despite the alleged resemblance depending entirely on an abstraction of both phenomena, to whatever extent is necessary to obscure the incongruent details and render them apparently resemblant. This entails a subtle form of cherry-picking that manipulates or filters the consideration of data in the interests of theoretical/philosophical commitments, thus making it arguably antiscientific, inasmuch as the primary goal of science is the adaptation of theory to reality, via data collected and analyzed as rigorously and objectively as possible. Examples and further discussion of this fallacy are provided, along with a call for researchers to cease this scientifically problematic practice.
References
Andrade, C. (2021). HARKing, cherry-picking, p-hacking, fishing expeditions, and data dredging and mining as questionable research practices. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 82(1). https://doi.org/10.4088/JCP.20f13804
Bentall, R. P. (2014). Hallucinatory experiences. In E. Cardeña, S. J. Lynn, & S. Krippner (Eds.), Varieties of anomalous experience: Examining the scientific evidence. 2nd ed. (pp. 109-143). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/10371-003
Belanti, J., Perera, M., & Jagadheesan, K. (2008). Phenomenology of near-death experiences: A cross-cultural perspective. Transcultural Psychiatry, 45(1), 121–133. https://doi.org/10.1177/1363461507088001
Blackmore, S. J., & Troscianko, T. S. (1989). The physiology of the tunnel. Journal of Near-Death Studies, 8(1), 15–28. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01074066
Blackmore, S. (1999). Letter to the editor: Tunnel vision and tunnel experiences [Letter to the editor]. Journal of Near-Death Studies, 17(4), 237–240. https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc938046/
Bókkon, I., Mallick, B. N., & Tuszynski, J. A. (2013). Near death experiences: A multidisciplinary hypothesis. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7, 533. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00533
Bryant, B. (2018, September 11). A DMT trip 'feels like dying' – and scientists now agree. BBC Three. https://www.bbc.com/bbcthree/article/dd52796e-5935-414e-af0c-de9686d02afa
Cardeña, E. (2022). What is swept under the rug? Journal of Anomalous Experience and Cognition, 2(1), 5–15.
Cardeña, E., Lynn, S. J., & Krippner, S. (2017). The psychology of anomalous experiences: A rediscovery. Psychology of Consciousness: Theory, Research, and Practice, 4(1), 4–22. https://doi.org/10.1037/cns0000093
Charland-Verville, V., Jourdan, J. P., Thonnard, M., Ledoux, D., Donneau, A. F., Quertemont, E., & Laureys, S. (2014). Near-death experiences in non-life-threatening events and coma of different etiologies. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8, 203. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00203
Choi, C. Q. (2011, September 12). Peace of mind: Near-death experiences now found to have scientific explanations. Scientific American. https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/peace-of-mind-near-death/
Dinsmore, J. (2024). Mystical luminosity experience: An initiation of a construct grounded in phenomenology. Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004700604
Facco, E., & Agrillo, C. (2012). Near-death experiences between science and prejudice. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 6, 209. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2012.00209
Facco, E., Agrillo, C., & Greyson, B. (2015). Epistemological implications of near-death experiences and other non-ordinary mental expressions: Moving beyond the concept of altered state of consciousness. Medical Hypotheses, 85(1), 85–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mehy.2015.04.004
Greyson, B. (2015). Western scientific approaches to near-death experiences. Humanities, 4(4), 775–796. https://doi.org/10.3390/h4040775
Greyson, B., Holden, J. M., & Van Lommel, P. (2012). ‘There is nothing paranormal about near-death experiences’ revisited: comment on Mobbs and Watt. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 16(9), 445. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2012.07.002
Greyson, B., Kelly, E. W., & Kelly, E. F. (2009). Explanatory models for near-death experiences. In J. M. Holden, B. Greyson, & D. James (Eds.), The handbook of near-death experiences: Thirty years of investigation (pp. 213–234). Praeger. https://doi.org/10.5040/9798400661389.ch-010
Holden, J. M. (2009). Veridical perception in near-death experiences. The handbook of near-death experiences: Thirty years of investigation, 185-211. https://doi.org/10.5040/9798400661389.ch-009
Kastrup, B. (2016). The physicalist worldview as neurotic ego-defense mechanism. SAGE Open, 6(4), 2158244016674515. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244016674515
Kunda, Z. (1990). The case for motivated reasoning. Psychological Bulletin, 108(3), 480–498. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.108.3.480
Lange, R., Ross, R. M., Dagnall, N., Irwin, H. J., Houran, J., & Drinkwater, K. (2019). Anomalous experiences and paranormal attributions: Psychometric challenges in studying their measurement and relationship. Psychology of Consciousness: Theory, Research, and Practice, 6(4), 346–359. https://doi.org/10.1037/cns0000187
Liester, M. B. (2013). Near-death experiences and ayahuasca-induced experiences: Two unique pathways to a phenomenologically similar state of consciousness. Journal of Transpersonal Psychology, 45(1), 24–47.
Martial, C., Carhart-Harris, R., & Timmermann, C. (2024). Within-subject comparison of near-death and psychedelic experiences: Acute and enduring effects. Neuroscience of Consciousness, 2024(1), niaa033. https://doi.org/10.1093/nc/niaa033
Maraun, M. D., & Gabriel, S. M. (2013). Illegitimate concept equating in the partial fusion of construct validation theory and latent variable modeling. New Ideas in Psychology, 31(1), 32–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.newideapsych.2012.09.002
Michael, P., Luke, D., & Robinson, O. (2023). This is your brain on death: A comparative analysis of a near-death experience and subsequent 5-Methoxy-DMT experience. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1083361. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1083361
Michael, P., Luke, D., & Robinson, O. (2021). An encounter with the other: A thematic and content analysis of DMT experiences from a naturalistic field study. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 720717. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.720717
Michalski, J. H. (2022). The sociological determinants of scientific bias. Journal of Moral Education, 51(1), 47–60. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057240.2022.2028345
Mobbs, D., & Watt, C. (2011). There is nothing paranormal about near-death experiences: how neuroscience can explain seeing bright lights, meeting the dead, or being convinced you are one of them. Trends in cognitive sciences, 15(10), 447-449. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2011.07.010
Parnia, S., Spearpoint, K., De Vos, G., Fenwick, P., Goldberg, D., Yang, J., ... & Schoenfeld, E. R. (2014). AWARE—AWAreness during REsuscitation—A prospective study. Resuscitation, 85(12), 1799-1805.
Peters, E., Joseph, S., Day, S., & Garety, P. (2004). Measuring delusional ideation: The 21-item Peters et al. Delusions Inventory (PDI). Schizophrenia Bulletin, 30(4), 1005–1022. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.schbul.a007116
Popper, K. R., & Eccles, J. C. (1977). The self and its brain: An argument for interactionism. Springer International. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-61891-8
Portides, D. (2018). Idealization and abstraction in scientific modeling. Synthese, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-018-01919-7
Timmermann, C., Roseman, L., Williams, L., Erritzoe, D., Martial, C., Cassol, H., & Carhart-Harris, R. (2018). DMT models the near-death experience. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 395. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00395
Van Lommel, P. (2007). Consciousness beyond life: The science of near-death experience (1st ed.). HarperCollins.
Yaden, D. B., & Newberg, A. (2022). The varieties of spiritual experience: 21st century research and perspectives. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190665678.001.0001
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Jonathan Dinsmore
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
All articles published in JAEX are open access, freely and universally accessible online, and archived in the open journal’s Lund University website (https://journals.lub.lu.se). Articles in JAEX can be distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License CCBY (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, with appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, a link to the Creative Commons license, and an indication if changes were made.
