Genul fantastic în context totalitar. Convergențe în reprezentarea anti-eroului la Mihail Bulgakov și la Matei Vișniec

The fantastic genre in a totalitarian context. Convergences in the representation of the antihero in Mikhail Bulgakov’s and Matei Vișniec’s works

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35824/sjrs.v9i1.28649

Keywords:

Matei Visniec, fantastic, Mikhail Bulgakov, antihero, totalitarianism

Abstract

Our article examines the convergences and divergences in the portrayal of the antihero in Mikhail Bulgakov’s Maestrul și Margarita [The Master and Margarita] and Matei Vișniec’s Sindromul de panică în Orașul Luminilor [The Panic Syndrome in the City of Lights]. Both novels construct intricate narrative frameworks where the antihero emerges through multiple characters, establishing an intertextual connection between the two works. By applying contemporary methodologies to analyze social and cultural contexts, this study highlights the significance of intertextual relationships while exploring the semantic dimensions of both texts beyond their structural similarities. In both works, the antihero embodies the intersection of social traumas induced by totalitarianism and playful, non-monstrous fantastic elements. Additionally, the urban setting – a prominent topos in postwar literature – undergoes a comparable process of fictionalization in both novels. Through the antihero’s compensatory positive attributes, an ethical framework is reestablished within the narrative universe. Bulgakov’s fantastic imagery sets a new paradigm, which, when compared with Vișniec’s approach, underscores the shared motifs and modalities of the fantastic, illuminating the drama of modern humanity in a world literature context.

Author Biographies

Elena Purușniuc, Alexandru Ioan Cuza University of Iași, Romania

https://orcid.org/0009-0000-2400-571X

https://www.scopus.com/authid/detail.uri?authorId=59394147000

https://www.webofscience.com/wos/author/record/POV-9098-2026

Elena Purușniuc is an undergraduate student in World and Comparative Literature and English Language and Literature at the Faculty of Letters, Alexandru Ioan Cuza University of Iași. Her research interests include literary theory, comparative literature, and the study of cultural identity and alterity in modern and contemporary literature, with a particular focus on the relationship between aesthetics and ideological discourse. She has presented papers at national and international academic conferences. She has also published papers in indexed journals. Her work has received several academic distinctions, including First Prize at the National Colloquium Emerging Theories and Practices in Literary and Linguistic Studies (2025) and honourable mentions at the International Colloquium Romanian Literature as World Literature (2024, 2025).

Ștefan-Tudor Baciu, Alexandru Ioan Cuza University of Iași, Romania

https://orcid.org/0009-0008-2079-7770

https://www.webofscience.com/wos/author/record/POV-3559-2026

Ștefan-Tudor Baciu is an undergraduate student in Romanian Language and Literature – Russian Language and Literature at Alexandru Ioan Cuza University of Iași. His primary academic interests include Comparative Literature, Cultural Studies, and Literary Theory. His research explores Russian postmodernism and Caucasian literature from the former Soviet states, with a particular focus on the relationship between aesthetics and ideological discourse. He has presented papers at several international academic conferences in Kazakhstan, Georgia, Romania, and Azerbaijan, and has published literary criticism in indexed journals.

References

Bakhtin, M. M. (1999). Problems of Dostoevsky’s poetics. (C. Emerson, Trans.). University of Minnesota Press.

Barthes, R. (1977). Image – Music – Text. (S. Heath, Trans.). Hill and Wang.

Brandist, C. (1996). Bulgakov’s The Master and Margarita and the Devil’s Carnival. In Carnival Culture and the Soviet Modernist Novel. London: Palgrave Macmillan (St Antony’s Series). 196-220. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-25120-9_8

Bulgakov, M. A. (2017). Maestrul și Margareta [The Master and Margarita]. (I. Covaci, Trans.). Humanitas Fiction.

Campbell, J. (2004). Eroul cu o mie de fețe [The Hero with a Thousand Faces]. (M. Mănescu, G. Deniz, Trans.) Editura Herald.

Cărtărescu, M. (2024). Postmodernismul românesc [Romanian Postmodernism]. Humanitas.

Chanady, A. B. (1982). Magical realism and the fantastic: Resolved versus unresolved antinomy. Routledge.

Chudakova, M. O. (2019). Mikhail Bulgakov. The life and times. Glagoslav Publications B.V.

Chudakova, M. O. (1989). Mihail Bulgakov: Zhizneopisaniye i sud’ba. [Mikhail Bulgakov: Biography and Destiny]. Znamya, nr. 7, 228–231.

Conkan, M. & Gârdan, D. (2020). Space in Literature and Literature in Space [Space in Literature and Literature in Space]. Metacritic Journal for Comparative Studies and Theory, 6(1). 5-15. https://doi.org/10.24193/mjcst.2020.9.01

Culianu, I. P. (2012). Iter in silvis: Eseuri despre gnoză și alte studii [Iter in silvis: Essays on Gnosis and Other Studies]. Polirom.

Curtis, J. A. E. (1987). Bulgakov’s Last Decade: The Writer as a Hero. Cambridge University Press.

Curtis, J. A. E. (2017). Mikhail Bulgakov [Mikhail Bulgakov]. Reaktion Books.

Curtis, J. A. E. (2019). A Reader’s Companion to Mikhail Bulgakov’s The Master and Margarita. Academic Studies Press.

Damrosch, D. (2023). Cum comparăm literaturile [How to Compare Literatures]. (R. Eichel, Trans.). Tracus Arte.

Derrida, J. (2008). The Animal That Therefore I Am. Fordham University Press.

Fish, S. (1980). Is There a Text in This Class. Harvard U. Press.

Genette, G. (1980). Narrative Discourse: An Essay in Method. (J. E. Lewin, Trans). Cornell University Press.

Groys, B. (2017). Between Stalin and Dionysus: Bakhtin’s Theory of the Carnival. Dialogic Pedagogy: An International Online Journal, Vol. 5, 1-5.

Holhoș, M., Holhoș, A. G. (2024). Reprezentarea realității urbane moscovite în romanul Maestrul și Margareta de Mihail Bulgakov. Magicul cu rol corectiv [The Representation of Moscow Urban Reality in the Novel The Master and Margarita by Mihail Bulgakov. The Magic Having a Corrective Role]. Incursiuni în imaginar, 15(2), 213–240. https://doi.org/10.29302/InImag.2024.15.2.8

Iovănel, M. (2017). Ideologiile literaturii în postcomunismul românesc [The Ideologies of Literature in Romanian Postcommunism]. Muzeul Literaturii Române.

Jackson, R. (2009). Fantasy: The Literature of Subversion. Taylor & Francis e-Library.

Lerner, M., Mims, E. (1933). Literature. Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences. Vol. IX, 523–543.

Meizoz, J. (2003). Ethos, champ et facture des œuvres: recherches sur la posture [Ethos, Field and Workmanship of Literary Works: Research on Posture]. Pratiques, nr. 117–118, 241–250.

Nekrasova, L. (2015). Behemoth in M. Bulgakov’s Novel The Master and Margarita – The Character for Communication. Journal of International Scientific Publications, 9, 65–72.

Negrici, E. (2003). Literatura română sub comunism. Proza [Romanian Literature under Communism. Prose]. Editura Fundației Pro.

Orlando, F. (2006). Forms of the Supernatural in Narrative. In The Novel, Vol. 2, Forms and Themes, (ed. F. Moretti), 207–244. Princeton University Press.

Orlov, M. (2022) Srednevekovye predstavlenija o nechistoj sile, ili Istorija snoshenij cheloveka s djavolom [Medieval Ideas About Evil Spirits, or The History of Human Relations With The Devil]. Lomonosov.

Pittman, R. H. (1991). The Writer’s Divided Self in Bulgakov’s The Master and Margarita. St. Martin’s Press.

Radtchenko-Draillard, S. (2020). The spectre of reality in the symbolic and fantastical universe imagined by Mikhail Bulgakov in the novel The Master and Margarita. Proposal Research. 1-30 https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.27965.69606

Șerban, I. V. (2024). Critica sociologică [Sociological Criticism]. Tracus Arte.

Todorov, T. (1973). Introducere în literatura fantastică [Introduction to Fantastic Literature]. Univers.

Vișniec, M. (2012). Sindromul de panică în Orașul Luminilor [Panic Syndrome in the City of Lights]. Polirom.

Downloads

Published

2026-05-15

How to Cite

Purușniuc, E., & Baciu, Ștefan-T. (2026). Genul fantastic în context totalitar. Convergențe în reprezentarea anti-eroului la Mihail Bulgakov și la Matei Vișniec : The fantastic genre in a totalitarian context. Convergences in the representation of the antihero in Mikhail Bulgakov’s and Matei Vișniec’s works. Swedish Journal of Romanian Studies, 9(1), 141–156. https://doi.org/10.35824/sjrs.v9i1.28649