Utopie postumanistă și parabolă politică în proza lui Sergiu Fărcășan

Posthumanist utopia and political parable in the prose of Sergiu Fărcășan

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35824/sjrs.v9i1.28517

Keywords:

Romanian science-fiction, Sergiu Fărcăşan, Posthumanism, utopia, parable

Abstract

The paper proposes a reinterpretation of Sergiu Fărcășan’s prose – more precisely, of the novels Atacul cesiumiștilor (1963) [The Attack of the Cesiumists] and Vă caută un Taur (1970) [A Bull Is Searching for You], as well as the short story collection Mașina de rupt prieteniile (1968) [The Friendship-Breaking Machine] – highlighting the ambiguity of the science-fiction scenarios, which simultaneously legitimize and undermine a totalitarian political ideology. The selected texts are built upon the constant tension between the cliché of official propagandistic discourse – in which technological achievements serve humankind and stand as a sign of its superiority, as well as of the political regime that makes them possible – and the undermining of official policy through the use of parable and the imagining of utopian worlds. The posthumanist problematic – illustrated by the confrontation between the human and artificial-intelligence systems, the matter-information relationship, the prosthetics of the human body, the state of consciousness, or the cyborgization of the narrative – serve both the discourse of technological-optimism propaganda and a set of serious inquiries developed in a political and profoundly humanistic key. The propagandistic discourse acquires posthumanist overtones, for the technological progress leads to a deconstruction of the human, both through massification and through remodelling, whether mental or physical.

Author Biography

Daniela Petroșel, ”Ștefan cel Mare” University of Suceava, Romania

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3340-2503

https://www.webofscience.com/wos/author/record/68774394

https://www.scopus.com/authid/detail.uri?authorId=55203601300

Daniela Petroșel, PhD, Habil. is a university professor of Romanian literature at Ștefan cel Mare University of Suceava, Romania. She received a PhD in Philology (Romanian literature) in 2006 from Alexandru Ioan Cuza University, Iaşi. She has published the following volumes The Rhetoric of Parody (2006), The Age of the Machine: On Posthumanism and the Technological Imaginary in Literature (2014), The Fiction of Critical Methods (2021), and Kitsch: Literary Functions, Cultural Dysfunctions (2023).

References

Bould, M., Miéville, C. (2009). Red Planets: Marxism and Science Fiction. Wesleyan University Press.

Fărcășan, S. (1963). Atacul cesiumiștilor [The Attack of the Cesiumists]. Editura Tineretului.

Fărcășan, S. (1968). Maşina de rupt prieteniile [The Friendship-Breaking Machine]. Editura Tineretului.

Fărcășan, S. (1970). Vă caută un Taur [A Bull Is Searching for You]. Editura Albatros.

Graham, E. L. (2002), Representations of the Posthuman: Monsters, Aliens, and Others in Popular Culture, Manchester University Press.

Marinetti, F. T. (2009). Manifestele futurismului [The Manifestos of Futurism] (E. David Drogoreanu, Trad.). ART.

Hayles, K. (1999). How We Became Posthuman: Virtual Bodies in Cybernetics, Literature, and Informatics. Chicago University Press.

Moravec, H. (1988). Mind children: the future of robot and human intelligence. Harvard University Press.

Pepperel, R. (2003). The Posthuman Condition. Intellect Books.

Petroşel, D. (2014). Era maşinii. Despre postumanism şi imaginarul tehnologic în literatură [The Age of the Machine: On Posthumanism and the Technological Imaginary in Literature], Editura Tracus Arte.

Popescu, M.-E. (2018). Proxemica uman-robot în Planète sauvage [Human-Robot Proxemics in “Planète Sauvage”]. Incursiuni în imaginar [Incursions into the Imaginary], 9, 268-276. https://doi.org/10.29302/InImag.2018.9.18

Downloads

Published

2026-05-15

How to Cite

Petroșel, D. (2026). Utopie postumanistă și parabolă politică în proza lui Sergiu Fărcășan : Posthumanist utopia and political parable in the prose of Sergiu Fărcășan. Swedish Journal of Romanian Studies, 9(1), 114–126. https://doi.org/10.35824/sjrs.v9i1.28517