Considerații privind valoarea de optativ a conjunctivului românesc și bulgăresc în propoziții independente
Insights on the optative value of subjunctive in independent clauses in Romanian and Bulgarian
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35824/sjrs.v7i2.25974Keywords:
subjunctive, optative sentences, Romanian, Bulgarian, Balkan SprachbundAbstract
The Romanian and Bulgarian languages share common features stemming from the Balkan linguistic aria. Among the distinctive grammatical constructions in Balkan languages is the new-type analytic subjunctive, a replacement for the infinitive in various languages such as Romanian, Bulgarian, Macedonian, Albanian, and Greek. The subjunctive can manifest in present, imperfect, perfect, and pluperfect tenses in most languages. However, Romanian has more limited combinations, employing only the present and perfect tenses. Despite these differences, the subjunctive shares structural, semantic, and usage similarities across Balkan languages. The use of the subjunctive in optative sentences is a common feature in Balkan languages, conveying achievable desires in the present and strong but unrealizable wishes in the past. This paper aims to broaden the research on the Balkan-type subjunctive by illustrating parallels in the modal values of this mood in Romanian and Bulgarian in independent optative sentences. The research underscores numerous correspondences in the use of the subjunctive in optative sentences in Romanian and Bulgarian. In both languages, within the optative context, the subjunctive expresses various sentiments such as desire, wishes, regret, protest, and indignation. The expression of both factual and counterfactual desires using present and past subjunctive forms is also similar in both languages. The present forms of the subjunctive express a factual desire, meaning an achievable wish that could be fulfilled in the future. The present subjunctive forms are very often encountered in idiomatic expressions that convey wishes and imprecations. Many similarities are noted between expressions in the two languages, both in terms of structure and in semantics and lexical means. The use of present subjunctive forms is not typical for expressing counterfactual wishes (unrealizable or difficult to achieve) but occurs in specific contexts. Wishes expressed through past subjunctive forms are counterfactual because the circumstances in which they could have been realized are omitted. Such statements convey the speaker's regret regarding an unfulfilled desire. In Romanian grammar, detailed treatment of the uses of the perfect subjunctive is lacking, but it is noted to have optative value. In Bulgarian, counterfactual wishes are expressed using three past tenses of the subjunctive – pluperfect, imperfect, and perfect. In this regard, the capabilities of the perfect subjunctive in Romanian stand out for expressing multiple meanings. With the exception of some meanings of the imperfect subjunctive in Bulgarian, the perfect subjunctive in Romanian can convey nearly all the meanings of the three past tenses in Bulgarian. The study highlights numerous similarities in the use of the subjunctive in Romanian and Bulgarian in optative sentences, offering observations that contribute to a deeper understanding of this mood within the field of Romanian, Bulgarian, and Balkan linguistics.
References
Amman, A., & van der Auwera, J. (2004). Complementizer-headed main clauses for volitional moods in the languages of South-Eastern Europe: A Balkanism? In O.M. Tomić (Ed.), Balkan Syntax and Semantics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 293-314.
Asenova, P. (2002). Balkansko ezikoznanie [Balkan linguistics]. Veliko Tarnovo: Faber.
Avram, M. (1986). Gramatica pentru toți [Grammar for everyone]. București: Editura Academiei Republicii Socialiste România.
Bîlbîie, G., & Mardale, A. (2018). The Romanian subjunctive from a Balkan perspective. In I. Krapova, B. Joseph (Eds.), Balkan Syntax and (Universal) Principles of Grammar. Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter Mouton, pp. 278-314. Retrieved December 20, 2023, from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/329211362_The_Romanian_subjunctive_from_a_Balkan_perspective.
Borchin, M.I. (2007). Valorile modale ale conjunctivului [Modal values of the subjunctive]. In The Annals of the West University of Timișoara. Humanities Series, 45, 73-92.
Chakarova, K. (2008). Povelitelnite da-konstruktsii v savremennia balgarski ezik i problemat za „balgarskia konyunktiv“. [Imperative da-constructions in the modern Bulgarian language and the problem of the “Bulgarian subjunctive”]. In V Slavistika. III. V chest na XIV mezhdunaroden kongres na slavistite, Ohrid, 2008 g [Slavic studies 3. In honor of the 14th International Congress of Slavists, Ohrid, 2008], pp. 98-112. Plovdiv: Paisii Hilendarski University Press.
Corbeanu, R.C. (2022). The subjunctive in Istro-Romanian and the status of neca. In Revue Roumaine de Linguistique, 67, 209-221. Retrieved February 17, 2024, from https://lingv.ro/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/RRL-3-2022-10-Ramona.pdf.
Deyanova, M. (1979). Kam diskusiyata za da-konstructsiyata v novobalgarski [To the discussion on the da-construction in Modern Bulgarian]. In Bulgarian Language, 5, 422-425. Sofia: Publishing House of BAS.
Emiliyanova, B., & Mihăilescu, S. (2020). Uniunea lingvistică balcanică: Limbile bulgară și română în context balcanic [The Balkan linguistic aria: Bulgarian and Romanian languages in a Balkan context]. In C. Dărăbuș, E. C. Zăbavă (Coord.), Frontiere si contacte. Fenomene locale, regionale și globale [Borders and contacts. Local, regional and global phenomena], pp. 43-58. Craiova: Aius.
Fielder, G.E. (1993). The semantics and pragmatics of verbal categories in Bulgarian. Lewiston: Edwin Mellen Press. Retrieved December 3, 2023, from http://www.seelrc.org:8080/grammar/mainframe.jsp?nLanguageID=9.
Friedman, V.A. (2001). Macedonian reference grammar. USA: SEELRC, Duke University. Retrieved February 28, 2024, from http://www.seelrc.org:8080/grammar/mainframe.jsp?nLanguageID=3.
Gadzheva, S. (2015). Za konyunktiva v balkanskite ezitsi i da-konstruktsiite v balgarskiya ezik: Upotreba i znachenie v glavnite izrecheniya [On the subjunctive in the Balkan languages and da-constructions in the Bulgarian language: Use and meaning in main clauses]. In P. Asenova (Sastav.) Balkanskite ezitsi, literaturi i kulturi. Divergentsiya i konvergentsiya [Balkan languages, literatures, and cultures. Divergence and convergence], pp. 70-79. Sofia: St. Kliment Ohridski University Press. Retrieved December 3, 2023, from https://www.slav.uni-sofia.bg/images/stories/documents/BALKANSKITE_ESIZI.pdf.
GALR: Gramatica limbii române. I: Cuvântul [The grammar of the Romanian language. I: The word]. V. Guțu Romalo (Ed.). București: Editura Academiei Române, 2005.
GBLR: Gramatica de bază a limbii române [Basic grammar of the Romanian language]. G. Pană Dindelegan (Ed.). București: Univers Enciclopedic Gold, 2010.
Georgiev, St. (1991). Balgarska morfologia [Bulgarian morphology]. Veliko Tarnovo: Abagar.
GSBKE II (1983): Gramatika na savremennia balgarski knizhoven ezik. ІІ: Morfologia [Grammar of the Modern Bulgarian Literary Language. ІІ: Morphology]. S. Stoyanov (Ed.). Sofia: Publishing House of BAS.
Hill, V., & Tomić, O. (2009), A typology of subjunctive complements in Balkan languages. In Bucharest Working Papers in Linguistics, 11 (1), 197-209. Bucharest University Press. Retrieved December 20, 2023, from https://bwpl.unibuc.ro/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/BWPL_2009_1_Hill_Tomic.pdf.
Ivanov et al. (2010). Ivanov, L., Skordev, D., & Dobrev, D: The new national Standard for the Romanization of Bulgarian. In Mathematica Balkanica (New Series), 24 (1-2), 121-130. Retrieved December 18, 2023, from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/318530616_The_New_National_Standard_for_the_Romanization_of_Bulgarian.
Kaldieva-Zaharieva, S. (2005). Problemi na sapostavitelnoto izsledvane na balgarskata i rumanskata frazeologia [Issues in the comparative study of Bulgarian and Romanian phraseology]. Sofia: Prof. Marin Drinov Publishing House of BAS.
Krapova, I. (2001), Subjunctives in Bulgarian and modern Greek. In M.L. Rivero, A. Ralli, (Eds.) Comparative Syntax of the Balkan Languages. Oxford University Press. Retrieved December 12, 2023, from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/288520161_Subjunctives_in_Bulgarian_and_modern_Greek.
Maldzhieva, V., (1990). Harakteristika na da-konstruktsiata v balgarskia ezik s otsled kam neynite funktsionalni ekvivalenti v slavyanskite ezitsi [Characteristics of the da-construction in Bulgarian in the context of its functional equivalents in Slavic languages. In Contrastive Linguistics, 15(4-5), 213-217.
Markou, C. (2019). Izrazyavane na optativnost v balgarskiya i novogratskiya ezik [Expression of optative modality in Bulgarian and Modern Greek]. In Balgaristichni ezikovedski cheteniya: Materiali ot mezhdunarodnata konferentsiya po sluchay 130-godishninata na SU „Sv. Kliment Okhridski” [Bulgarian Linguistic Readings: Materials from the international conference on the occasion of the 130th anniversary of Sofia University “St. Kliment Ohridski”], November 19-20, 2018, pp. 157-166). Sofia: St. Kliment Ohridski University Press. Retrieved November 19, 2023, from https://ngf-bg.com/verbs/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/Markou-Optative.pdf.
Maslov, I.S. (1982). Gramatika na balgarskia ezik [Grammar of the Bulgarian language] Sofia: Nauka i izkustvo.
Nevaci, M. & Geana, I. (2016). Consideraţii privind subordonarea la nivelul frazei în dialectul aromân [Considerations on subordination at the sentence level in Aromanian dialect]. In Fonetică și Dialectologie, 35, 155-162. București: Editura Academiei. Retrieved February 17, 2024, from https://www.diacronia.ro/ro/indexing/details/A24899.
Nitsolova, R. (2023). Balgarska gramatika: Morfologia [Bulgarian grammar: Morphology] (2nd ed.). Sofia: St. Kliment Ohridski University Press. (Original work published 2008).
Railean, D. (1998). Cu privire la unele întrebuințări ale conjunctivului perfect în limba română contemporană [On some uses of the perfect subjunctive in contemporary Romanian]. In SCL 49 (1-2), 277-281.
RBE. (n.d.). Da. In Rechnik na balgarskia ezik (online) [Bulgarian language dictionary (online)]. Institute for Bulgarian Language. Retrieved November 19, 2023, from https://ibl.bas.bg/rbe/lang/bg/%D0%B4%D0%B0/.
Sasheva, V. (2015). Polifunktsionalnoto DA v balgarskiya ezik: (Funktsionalno-semantichni i modalni osobenosti na nezavisimite da-izrecheniya v savremenniya balgarski ezik) [The polyfunctional DA in the Bulgarian language: (Functional-semantic and modal features of independent da-sentences in the modern Bulgarian language)]. Veliko Tarnovo: St. Cyril and St. Methodius University Press.
Sasheva, V. (2016). Da-izrecheniyata – mezhdu gramatika i pragmatika [Da-sentences – between grammar and pragmatics]. In Forum „Balgarska gramatika”. 2. Gramatika i pragmatika [Forum “Bulgarian Grammar”. 2. Grammar and pragmatics], November 19, 2015, pp. 100-112. Veliko Tarnovo: St. Cyril and St. Methodius University Press.
Steinke, K., & Vraciu, A. (1999). Introducere în lingvistica balcanică [Introduction to Balkan linguistics]. Iași: Editura Universității Al. I. Cuza.
Stoianova, D. (1988). Întrebuințări ale conjunctivului în limbile romană și bulgară și construcția da + verb în bulgară [Uses of the subjunctive in Romanian and Bulgarian languages and the construction “da + verb” in Bulgarian]. SCL 39(5), 447-458.
Tomić, O.M. (2004). The Balkan Sprachbund properties: An introduction. In O.M. Tomić (Ed.), Balkan Syntax and Semantics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 1-55.
Zafiu, R. (2013). The verb: Mood, tense and aspect. In G. Pană Dindelegan, M. Maiden (Eds.), The Grammar of Romanian. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Boryana Emiliynova, Silvia Mihăilescu
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
a. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
b. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
c. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
