Understanding the Factors at Play in the Sender-Receiver Dynamic During the Telepathy Ganzfeld
A Meta-Analysis
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31156/jaex.23878Keywords:
meta-analysis, ganzfeld, telepathy, extrasensory perception, psi hypothesis, anomalous cognition, ESPAbstract
Objective. To use meta-analysis to explore five previously uninvestigated factors related to the sender-receiver dynamic in the telepathy ganzfeld. The five factors of interest are: a) did the receiver see the sender’s room prior to the session?; b) could the sender hear the receiver during the mentation period?; c) could the sender hear the receiver during the judging period?; d) was the sender explicitly told to be silent?; and e) did the experimenter assist in the review section of the session? Method: Telepathy ganzfeld studies conducted post Joint Communiqué, with one session per day and the receivers rating the targets, were chosen. Two mixed-effects models were fit: 1) using the study hit rates as the binomial mean; and 2) using the study hit rates as a proportion. Both models have the five factors as binary moderators. Results: Both the binomial mean and proportion models suggest a significant effect of the moderators overall and two factors individually: 1) the sender being able to hear the receiver during the mentation period; and 2) a review period after the mentation period. Permutation tests for both models also show significant effects of the moderators and the two factors. Conclusion: The sender being able to hear the receiver’s mentation appears to increase overall study success, while the review period decreases overall study success
References
*Alexander, C. H., & Broughton, R. S. (2001). Cerebral hemisphere dominance and ESP performance in the autoganzfeld. Journal of Parapsychology, 65(4), 397–416.
Baptista, J., & Derakhshani, M. (2014). Beyond the coin toss: Examining Wiseman’s criticisms of parapsychology. Journal of Parapsychology, 78(1), 56–79.
Baptista, J., Derakhshani, M., & Tressoldi, P. E. (2015). Explicit anomalous cognition: A review of the best evidence in ganzfeld, forced-choice, remote viewing and dream studies. In E. Cardeña, J. Palmer, & D. Marcusson-Clavertz (Eds.), Parapsychology: A handbook for the 21st century (pp. 192–214). McFarland.
Bem, D. J., Palmer, J., & Broughton, R. S. (2001). Updating the Ganzfeld database: A victim of its own success? Journal of Parapsychology, 65(3), 207–218.
Berger, R. E., & Honorton, C. (1986). An automated psi ganzfeld testing system. In D. H. Weiner & D. I. Radin (Eds.), Research in parapsychology 1985 (pp. 85–88). Scarecrow Press.
Braude, S. E. (2021). Parra and the Journal of Scientific Exploration. Journal of Scientific Exploration, 35(3), 642–645. https://doi.org/10.31275/20212247
*Broughton, R. S., & Alexander, C. H. (1997). Autoganzfeld II: An attempted replication of the PRL ganzfeld research. Journal of Parapsychology, 61(3), 209–226.
Cardeña, E. (2018). The experimental evidence for parapsychological phenomena: A review. American Psychologist, 73(5), 663–677. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000236
Cardeña, E. (2020). Editorial: Pieces of the psi puzzle and a recipe for ganzfeld success. Journal of Parapsychology, 84(1), 5–7. https://doi.org/10.30891/jopar.2020.01.01
Cardeña, E. (2021). Alejandro Parra and Dante’s Eighth Circle of Hell. Journal of Scientific Exploration, 35(3), 639–641. https://doi.org/10.31275/20212243
*Cardeña, E., & Marcusson-Clavertz, D. (2020). Changes in state of consciousness and psi in ganzfeld and hypnosis conditions. Journal of Parapsychology, 84(1), 66–84. https://doi.org/10.30891/jopar.2020.01.07
Cardeña, E., Marcusson-Clavertz, D., & Palmer, J. (2015). Preface: Reintroducing parapsychology. In E. Cardeña, J. Palmer, & D. Marcusson-Clavertz (Eds.), Parapsychology: A handbook for the 21st century (pp. 1–12). McFarland Company.
*da Silva, F. E., Pilato, S., & Hiraoka, R. (2003). Ganzfeld vs. no ganzfeld: An exploratory study of the effects of ganzfeld conditions on ESP. In Proceedings of the 46th Annual Convention of the Parapsychological Association (pp. 31-49).
*Dalton, K. (1997). The relationship between creativity and anomalous cognition in the ganzfeld [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University of Edinburgh.
Fox, J. (2004). An initial categorization of the behavior of senders during ganzfeld trials. The Journal of the American Society for Psychical Research, 98(1–2), 68–92.
Goulding, A., Westerlund, J., Parker, A., & Wackermann, J. The first digital autoganzfeld study using a real-time judging procedure. European Journal of Parapsychology, 19, 66-97.
Higgins, P. T. J., & Thompson, G. S. (2002). Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis. Statistics in Medicine, 21, 1359–1558. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.1186
Higgins, P. T. J., Thompson, G. S., Deeks, J. J., & Altman, G. D. (2003). Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. British Medical Journal, 327, 557–560. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.327.7414.557
Honorton, C. (1977). Psi and internal attention states. In B. B. Wolman (Ed.), Handbook of parapsychology (pp. 435–472). McFarland.
Honorton, C. (1995). Impact of the sender in ganzfeld communication: Meta-analysis and power estimates. In Proceedings of presented papers: The Parapsychological Association 38th annual convention. (pp. 132–140).
*Honorton, C., Berger, R., Varvoglis, M., Quant, M., Derr, P., Schechter, E., & Ferrari, D. (1990). Psi communication in the ganzfeld: Experiments with an automated testing system and a comparison with a meta-analysis of earlier studies. Journal of Parapsychology, 54(2), 99–139.
Honorton, C., Ferrari, D. G., & Bem, D. J. (1998). Extraversion and ESP performance: A meta-analysis and a new confirmation. Journal of Parapsychology, 62(3), 255–276.
Hyman, R. (1995). Evaluation of the program on anomalous mental phenomena. Journal of Parapsychology, 59(4), 321–351.
Hyman, R., & Honorton, C. (1986). A joint communiqué: The psi ganzfeld controversy. Journal of Parapsychology, 50(4), 351–364.
*Kanthamani, H., & Broughton, R. S. (1994). Institute for Parapsychology ganzfeld ESP experiments: The manual series. In Proceedings of presented papers: The Parapsychological Association 37th annual convention (pp. 182–189).
Knapp, G., & Hartung, J. (2003). Improved tests for a random effects meta-regression with a single covariate. Statistics in Medicine, 22(17), 2693–2710. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.1482
Kübel, S. L., Fidler, H., & Wittmann, M. (2020). Red visual stimulation in the Ganzfeld leads to a relative overestimation of duration compared to green. PsyCh Journal, 10(1), 5–19. https://doi.org/10.1002/pchj.395
*Lau, M. (2004). The psi phenomena: A Bayesian approach to the Ganzfeld procedure [Unpublished master's thesis]. University of Notre Dame.
*Marcusson-Clavertz, D., & Cardeña, E. (2011). Hypnotizability, alterations in consciousness, and other variables as predictors of performance in a ganzfeld psi task. Journal of Parapsychology, 75(2), 235–259.
*McDonough, B. E., Don, N. S., Warren, C. A. (1994). EEG in a ganzfeld psi task. In The Parapsychological Association 37th annual convention proceedings of presented papers (pp. 273-283).
Milton, J. & Wiseman, R. (1999). Does psi exist? Lack of replication of an anomalous process of information transfer. Psychological Bulletin, 125(4), 387–391. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.125.4.387
Milton, J. (1997). Meta-analysis of free-response ESP studies without altered states of consciousness. Journal of Parapsychology, 61(4), 279–319.
Milton, J. (1999). Should ganzfeld research continue to be crucial in the search for a replicable psi effect? Part I. Discussion paper and introduction to an electronic-mail discussion. Journal of Parapsychology, 63(4), 309–333.
*Morris, R. L., Cunningham, S., McAlpine, S., & Taylor, R. (1993). Toward replication and extension of autoganzfeld results. In The Parapsychological Association 36th annual convention: Proceedings of presented papers (pp. 177-191).
*Morris, R. L., Dalton, K., Delanoy, D., & Watt, C. (1995). Comparison of the sender/no sender condition in the ganzfeld. In Proceedings of presented papers: The Parapsychological Association 38th annual convention (pp. 244–258).
*Morris, R. L., Summers, J., Yim, S. (2003). Evidence of anomalous information transfer with a creative population in ganzfeld stimulation. In Proceedings of the 46th Annual Convention of the Parapsychological Association (pp. 116-131).
Nahm, M. (2021). A new case of scientific dishonesty in the field of parapsychology. Journal of Scientific Exploration, 35(3), 623–638. https://doi.org/10.31275/20212237
Parapsychological Association. (2015). Ganzfeld. https://parapsych.org/articles/53/304/ganzfeld.aspx
*Parker, A., & Westerlund, J. (1998). Current research in giving the ganzfeld an old and a new twist. In Proceedings of presented papers: The Parapsychological Association 41st annual convention (pp. 135–142).
*Parker, A., Frederiksen, A., & Johansson, H. (1997). Towards specifying the recipe for success with the Ganzfeld. European Journal of Parapsychology, 13, 15–27.
*Parker, A., Grams, D., & Pettersson, C. (1998). Further variables relating to psi in the ganzfeld. Journal of Parapsychology, 62(4), 321–337.
Pooley, A. (2021). Sender-receiver relationship in the ganzfeld. In Book of Abstracts: 44th International annual conference of the Society for Psychical Research. (pp. 6-7).
Roe, C. A., & Holt, N. (2005). A further consideration of the sender as a PK agent in ganzfeld ESP studies. Journal of Parapsychology, 69(1), 113–127.
*Roe, C. A., Holt, N. J., & Simmonds, C. A. (2003). Considering the sender as a PK agent in the ganzfeld ESP studies. Journal of Parapsychology, 67(1), 129–145.
*Roe, C. A., McKenzie, E. A., & Ali, A. N. (2001). Sender and receiver creativity scores as predictors of performance at a Ganzfeld ESP task. Journal of the Society for Psychical Research, 65(863), 107–121.
*Roe, C. A., Sherwood, S. J., & Holt, N. J. (2004). Interpersonal psi: Exploring the role of the sender in ganzfeld GESP tasks. Journal of Parapsychology, 68(2), 361–380.
Schmeidler, G. R., & Edge, H. (1999). Should ganzfeld research continue to be crucial in the search for a replicable psi effect? Part II. Edited ganzfeld debate. Journal of Parapsychology, 63(4), 355–388.
Schmidt, T. T., & Prein, J. C. (2019). The Ganzfeld experience - A stably inducible altered state of consciousness: Effects of different auditory homogenizations. PsyCh Journal, 8(1), 66–81. https://doi.org/10.1002/pchj.262
*Simmonds-Moore, C., & Holt, N. J. (2007). Trait, state, and psi: A comparison of psi performance between clusters of scorers on schizotypy in a ganzfeld and waking control condition. Journal of the Society for Psychical Research, 71(889 [4])[4], 197–215.
Smith, M. D., & Savva, L. (2004). Experimenter effects and psi performance using a digital autoganzfeld system. In Proceedings of presented papers: The parapsychological association 47th annual convention. (pp. 461–463).
*Smith, M. D., & Savva, L. (2008). Experimenter effects in the ganzfeld. Proceedings of Presented Papers: The Parapsychological Association 51st Annual Convention. (pp. 238–249.
Storm, L., & Tressoldi, P. E. (2020). Meta-analysis of free-response studies 2009-2018: Assessing the noise-reduction model ten years on. Journal of the Society for Psychical Research, 84(4), 193–219. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/3d7at
Storm, L., Tressoldi, P. E., & Di Risio, L. (2010). Meta-analysis of free-response studies, 1992-2008: Assessing the noise reduction model in parapsychology. Psychological Bulletin, 136(4), 471–485. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019457
Tressoldi, P.E. (2019). Ganzfeld database 1974-2018. [Data set]. https://open-data.spr.ac.uk/dataset/1974-2018-ganzfeld-database
Tressoldi, P. E., & Storm, L. (2021). Stage 1 Registered Report: Anomalous perception in a Ganzfeld condition - A meta-analysis of more than 40 years investigation [version 3; peer review: 1 approved, 2 approved with reservations]. F1000Research. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.24868.3
Viechtbauer, W. (2005). Bias and efficiency of meta-analytic variance estimators in the random-effects model. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 30(3), 261–293. https://doi.org/10.3102/10769986030003261
Viechtbauer, W. (2010). Conducting meta-analyses in R with the metafor package. Journal of Statistical Software, 36(3), 1–48. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v036.i03
Viera, A. J., & Garrett, J. M. (2005). Understanding interobserver agreement: The kappa statistic. Family Medicine, 37(5), 360–363.
Watt, C., Dawson, E., Tullo, A., Pooley, A., & Rice, H. (2020). Testing precognition and alterations of consciousness with selected participants in the ganzfeld. Journal of Parapsychology, 84(1), 21–37. https://doi.org/10.30891/jopar.2020.01.05
Wezelman, R. & Bierman, D. J. (1997). Process orientated ganzfeld research in Amsterdam. In Proceedings of presented papers: The Parapsychological Association 40th annual convention, 477-492.
Wiseman, R., Smith, M., & Kornbrot, D. (1994). Assessing possible sender-to-experimenter acoustic leakage in the PRL autoganzfeld. In Proceedings of presented papers: The Parapsychological Association 37th annual convention, 439–454.
Wooffitt, R. (2003). Conversation analysis and parapsychology: Experimenter-subject interaction in ganzfeld experiments. Journal of Parapsychology, 67(2), 299–323.
*Wright, T., & Parker, A. (2003). An attempt to improve ESP scores using the real time digital Ganzfeld technique. European Journal of Parapsychology, 18, 65–72.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Abby L. Pooley, Aja L. Murray, Caroline Watt
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
All articles published in JAEX are open access, freely and universally accessible online, and archived in the open journal’s Lund University website (https://journals.lub.lu.se). Articles in JAEX can be distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License CCBY (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, with appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, a link to the Creative Commons license, and an indication if changes were made.
