Farmed Animal Sanctuaries: The Heart of the Movement?
One of the fundamental challenges for animal rights theory is to imagine the contours of just relations that humans might have with “farmed animals” once we stop confining and killing them for food. What sorts of social relationships would cows, pigs, chickens, and other animals be able to form with us, and with members of their own and other species? What kind of sex life, family life, and cooperative activities might they want to engage in? Farm sanctuaries are one of the few spaces today where these questions are being asked, and where possible answers are being explored. However, if sanctuaries are to be effective spaces for exploring a better future, some of their current practices may need to change. Farm sanctuaries originally developed as places of safe refuge for abused animals who were rescued from factory farms and slaughterhouses. Rescued animals live out their lives in safety and comfort, and also serve as ambassadors to the visiting public for all of the animals who remain trapped in the animal-industrial complex. We call this the “refuge + advocacy” model, and it is a noble vision that has inspired many people. But the offer of safe refuge is not the same as the opportunity to create a new and shared interspecies society. A different vision of a farm sanctuary would see its animal residents less as refugees and ambassadors, and more as citizens and pioneers of new “intentional communities” who are given the freedom to create a new social world. This paper explores the limits of the refuge + advocacy model, both in terms of the messages it communicates to human visitors and the freedoms it provides to its animal residents, and outlines an alternative model rooted in emerging practices of intentional community.
Animal Charity Evaluators. (n.d.). Vegetarian recidivism research. Retrieved September 21, 2015, from http://www.animalcharityevaluators.org/research/foundational-research/vegetarian-recidivism/
Animal Place. (n.d.). About. Retrieved September 21, 2015, from http://animalplace.org/about/
Arneil, B. (2008). Disability, self image, and modern political theory. Political Theory, 37(2), 218–242. http://doi.org/10.1177/0090591708329650
Balcombe, J. (2009). Animal pleasure and its moral significance. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 118(3–4), 208–216. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2009.02.012
Baur, G. (2008). Farm sanctuary: Changing hearts and minds about animals and food. New York, NY: Touchstone.
Bekoff, M. (2014, March 11). Do zoos really teach visitors anything? Retrieved September 21, 2015, from http://www.livescience.com/44006-do-zoos-teach.html
Brestrup, C. (2004, November). Animal sanctuaries and animal activism. Retrieved September 21, 2015, from http://www.satyamag.com/nov04/brestrup.html
Brown, J. (2012). The Lucky Ones: My passionate fight for farm animals. London, England: Penguin.
Bruhn, J. (2005). The Sociology of Community Connections. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer.
Catskill Animal Sanctuary. (n.d.). Mission and history—about. Retrieved September 21, 2015, from https://casanctuary.org/about/mission-and-history/
Cavalieri, P. (forthcoming). Animal liberation: A political perspective. In Cavalieri, P. (Ed.), Philosophy and the politics of animal liberation. London, England: Palgrave.
Cochrane, A. (2014). Born in chains? The ethics of animal domestication. In L. Gruen (Ed.), The ethics of captivity (pp. 156–173). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
Crain, W. (2014). The emotional lives of animals and children: Insights from a farm sanctuary. San Francisco, CA: Turning Stone Press.
DeMello, M. (2014). Rabbits in captivity. In L. Gruen (Ed.), The ethics of captivity (pp. 77–89). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
Donaldson, S., & Kymlicka, W. (2011). Zoopolis: A political theory of animal rights. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
Donaldson, S., & Kymlicka, W. (2013). Reply: Animal citizenship, liberal theory and the historical moment. Dialogue, 52(4), 769–786. http://doi.org/10.1017/S0012217313000863
Donaldson, S., & Kymlicka, W. (2015). Rethinking membership and participation in an inclusive democracy: Cognitive disability, children, animals. In B. Arneil & N. Hirschman (Eds.), Disability and political theory. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
Emmerman, K. (2014). Sanctuary, not remedy: The problem of captivity and the need for moral repair. In L. Gruen (Ed.), The Ethics of Captivity (pp. 213–30). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
Fargo, T. (2015). Religious and moral hybridity of vegetarian activism at farm animal sanctuaries. In S. Brunn (Ed.), The Changing World Religion Map (pp. 323–345) Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.
Feuerstein, N., & Terkel, J. (2008). Interrelationships of dogs (Canis familiaris) and cats (Felis catus L.) living under the same roof. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 113(1–3), 150–165. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2007.10.010
Forkasiewicz, K. (2014). Fragments of an animalist politics: Veganism and liberation. In J. Sorenson (Ed.), Critical animal studies: Thinking the unthinkable (pp. 46-64). Toronto, Canada: Canadian Scholars Press.
Francis, L. P., & Silvers, A. (2007). Liberalism and individually scripted ideas of the good: Meeting the challenge of dependent agency. Social Theory and Practice, 33(2), 311–34.
Gawande, A. (2014). Being mortal: Medicine and what matters in the end. New York, NY: Metropolitan.
Goffman, E. (1961). Asylums: Essays on the social situation of mental patients and other inmates. New York, NY: Anchor.
Green, C. (2014, December 2). How many former vegetarians and vegans are there? Retrieved September 21, 2015, from https://faunalytics.org/how-many-former-vegetarians-and-vegans-are-there/
Gruen, L. (2014). Dignity, captivity, and an ethics of sight. In L. Gruen (Ed.), The ethics of captivity (pp. 231–47). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
Herzog, H. (2011, June 20). Why do most vegetarians go back to eating meat? Retrieved September 21, 2015, from https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/animals-and-us/201106/why-do-most-vegetarians-go-back-eating-meat
Hiemstra, N. (2013). Intentional community: Revaluing people living with disabilities. (Betty G. Headley Senior Essay Award Paper, St. Jerome University), posted at: http://www.sju.ca/sites/default/files/Library/Headley%20essays/Headley%20Hiemstra%202013.pdf
Holzer, E. (2012). A case study of political failure in a refugee camp. Journal of Refugee Studies, 25(2), 257–281. http://doi.org/10.1093/jrs/fes006
Hribal, J. (2007, April 17). Resistance is never futile. Retrieved September 21, 2015, from http://www.counterpunch.org/2007/04/17/resistance-is-never-futile/
Inglis, I. R., Forkman, B., & Lazarus, J. (1997). Free food or earned food? A review and fuzzy model of contrafreeloading. Animal Behaviour, 53(6), 1171–1191. http://doi.org/10.1006/anbe.1996.0320
Jans, M. (2004). Children as citizens: Towards a contemporary notion of child participation. Childhood, 11(1), 27–44. http://doi.org/10.1177/0907568204040182
Jones, M. (2014). Captivity in the Context of a Sanctuary for Formerly Farmed Animals. In L Gruen, (Ed.), The Ethics of Captivity (pp. 90–101). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
jones, p. (2013). Afterword: Flower Power. In K. Socha & S. Blum (Eds.), Confronting animal exploitation: Grassroots essays on liberation and veganism. Jefferson, NC: McFarland.
jones, p. (2014a). Eros and the mechanisms of eco-defense. In C. Adams & L. Gruen (Eds.), Ecofeminism: Feminist intersections with other animals & the earth (pp. 91–108). New York: Bloomsbury.
jones, p. (2014b). The Oxen at the Intersection: A Collision. Herndon, VA: Lantern.
Kasperbauer, T. J. (2013). Nussbaum and the capacities of animals. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 26(5), 977–997. http://doi.org/10.1007/s10806-012-9436-5
Katuna, B., & Silfen Glasberg, D. (2014). Rules vs. Rights? Social Control, Dignity, and the Right to Housing in the Shelter System. Sociologists Without Borders, 9(1), 25–47. http://scholarlycommons.law.case.edu/swb/vol9/iss1/11
Kemble, W. J. (2012, September 20). Woodstock animal sanctuary neighbor has concerns. Retrieved September 23, 2015, from http://www.dailyfreeman.com/general-news/20120920/woodstock-animal-sanctuary-neighbor-has-concerns
Kenis, A., & Mathijs, E. (2014). (De)politicising the local: The case of the Transition Towns movement in Flanders (Belgium). Journal of Rural Studies, 34, 172–183. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2014.01.013
Koyama, E. (2006). Disloyal to feminism: Abuse of survivors within the domestic violence shelter system. In A. Smith, B. Richie, & J. Sudbury (Eds.), Color of violence: An INCITE anthology. Boston, MA: South End Press.
Laks, E. (2014). My gentle barn: Creating a sanctuary where animals heal and children learn to hope. New York, NY: Harmony Books.
Levitas, R. (1990). The concept of utopia. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press.
Lloro-Bidart, T. (2014). They call them “good luck polka dots”: Disciplining bodies, bird biopower, and human–animal relationships at the Aquarium of the Pacific. Journal of Political Ecology, 21, 389–407. http://jpe.library.arizona.edu/volume_21/Llorobidart.pdf
Margodt, K. (2010). Zoos as welfare arks? Reflections on an ethical course for zoos. In R. Acampora (Ed.), Metamorphoses of the zoo. Lanham. MD: Lexington.
Marohn, S. (2012). What the animals taught me. Newburyport, MA: Hampton Roads.
Matarrese, A. M. (2010). The boundaries of democracy and the case of non-humans. In-Spire Journal of Law, Politics and Societies, 5(1), 55–71.
Meijer, E. (2013). Political communication with animals. Humanimalia, 5(1), 28–52. http://www.depauw.edu/humanimalia/issue09/meijer.html
Meijering, L., Huigen, P., & Van Hoven, B. (2007). Intentional communities in rural spaces. Tijdschrift Voor Economische En Sociale Geografie, 98(1), 42–52. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9663.2007.00375.x
Myers, G. (1998). Children and animals: Social development and our connections to other species. Boulder, CO: Westview.
Peaceful Prairie Sanctuary. (n.d.). Mission. Vision. History. Retrieved September 21, 2015, from http://www.peacefulprairie.org/about.html
Pepper, D. (2005). Utopianism and environmentalism. Environmental Politics, 14(1), 3–22. http://doi.org/10.1080/0964401042000310150
Phelps, N. (2015). Changing the game: Why the battle for animal liberation is so hard and how we can win it (Revised ed.). Herndon, VA: Lantern.
Piebird Farm Sanctuary. (n.d.). Piebird Farm Sanctuary—About. Retrieved September 21, 2015, from http://www.piebird.ca/sanctuary/about.html
Pigs Peace Sanctuary (n.d.). About Pigs Peace Sanctuary. Retrieved September 21, 2015, from http://www.pigspeace.org/main/about.html
Prince, M. (2009). Absent citizens: Disability politics and policy in Canada. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Randell, M., & Cumella, S. (2009). People with an intellectual disability living in an intentional community. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 53(8), 716–726. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2788.2009.01181.x
Rodriguez, S. (2014, November 12). Three emotional approaches. Retrieved September 23, 2015, from http://directactioneverywhere.com/theliberationist/2014/11/11/three-emotional-approaches
Safe Haven Farm Sanctuary. (n.d.). Mission. Retrieved September 21, 2015, from http://safehavenfarmsanctuary.org/about-safe-haven/mission/
Saltsman, A. (2014). Beyond the law: Power, discretion, and bureaucracy in the management of asylum space in Thailand. Journal of Refugee Studies, 27(3), 457–476. http://doi.org/10.1093/jrs/feu004
Sargisson, L. (2001). Politicising the Quotidian. Environmental Politics, 10(2), 68–89. http://doi.org/10.1080/714000535
Sargisson, L. (2007). Strange places: Estrangement, utopianism, and intentional communities. Utopian Studies, 18(3), 393–424.
Seymour, M., & Wolch, J. (2009). Toward zoöpolis? Innovation and contradiction in a conservation community. Journal of Urbanism: International Research on Placemaking and Urban Sustainability, 2(3), 215–236. http://doi.org/10.1080/17549170903466020
Smith, J. A. (2003). Beyond dominance and affection: Living with rabbits in post-humanist households. Society & Animals, 11(2), 81–97. https://www.animalsandsociety.org/assets/library/506_s1124.pdf
Smith, K. K. (2012). Governing animals: Animal welfare and the liberal state. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Stallwood, K. (2014). Growl: Life lessons, hard truths, and bold strategies from an animal advocate. New York, NY: Lantern Books.
Stevens, K. (2009). Where the blind horse sings. New York, NY: Skyhorse.
Stevens, K. (2013). Animal camp: Reflections on a decade of love, hope, and veganism at Catskill Animal Sanctuary. New York, NY: Skyhorse.
Streiffer, R. (2014). The confinement of animals used in laboratory research: Conceptual and ethical issues. In L. Gruen (Ed.), The ethics of captivity (pp. 174–192) Oxford: Oxford University Press.
The Pig Preserve. (n.d.-a). Is there a solution? Retrieved September 22, 2015, from http://thepigpreserve.org/isthereasolution.htm
The Pig Preserve. (n.d.-b). Frequently asked questions. Retrieved September 22, 2015, from http://thepigpreserve.org/FAQ.htm
The Sanctuary for Senior Dogs. (n.d.). Mission statement. Retrieved September 23, 2015, from http://www.sanctuaryforseniordogs.org/id2.htm
United Poultry Concerns. (n.d.). About United Poultry Concerns. Retrieved September 21, 2015, from http://www.upc-online.org/more_about_upc.html
Van Kleek, J. (2014, June 24). The sanctuary in your backyard: A new model for rescuing farmed animals. Retrieved September 23, 2015, from http://www.ourhenhouse.org/2014/06/the-sanctuary-in-your-backyard-a-new-model-for-rescuing-farmed-animals/
Woodstock Farm Animal Sanctuary. (n.d.). Mission. Retrieved September 21, 2015, from http://woodstocksanctuary.org/about/mission/
Young, R. (2003). The secret life of cows: Animal sentience at work. Preston, England: Farming Books.
Copyright (c) 2015 Sue Donaldson, Will Kymlicka
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).