Phenomenology of AI-Generated "Entity Encounter" Narratives
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31156/jaex.25124Keywords:
AI, content analysis, entity encounters, HP-S, narrative construction, phenomenology, anomalous experienceAbstract
Objective: We used the ChatGPT-3.5 artificial intelligence (AI)-based language program to compare twelve types of mystical, supernatural, or otherwise anomalous entity encounter narratives constructed from material in the publicly available corpus of information, and compared their details to the phenomenology of spontaneous accounts via the Survey of Strange Events (SSE) and the grounded theory of Haunted People Syndrome (HP-S). Methods: Structured content analysis by two independent and masked raters explored whether the composite AI-narratives would: (a) cover each encounter type, (b) map to the SSE’s Rasch hierarchy of anomalous perceptions, (c) show an average SSE score, and (d) reference the five recognition patterns of HP-S. Results: We found moderate evidence of a core encounter phenomenon underlying the AI-narratives. Every encounter type was represented by an AI-generated description that readily mapped to the SSE, albeit their contents showed only fair believability and low but generally positive correlations with each other. The narratives also corresponded to below-average SSE scores and referenced at least one HP-S recognition pattern. Conclusions: Prototypical depictions of entity encounter experiences based on popular source material certainly approximate, yet not fully match, the phenomenology of their real-life counterparts. We discuss the implications of these outcomes for future studies.
References
Appelbaum, M., Cooper, H., Kline, R. B., Mayo-Wilson, E., Nezu, A. M., & Rao, S. M. (2018). Journal article reporting standards for quantitative research in psychology: The APA Publications and Communications Board task force report. American Psychologist, 73(1), 3–25. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000191
Bertens, L. C. M., Broekhuizen, B. D. L., Naaktgeboren, C. A., Rutten, F. H., Hoes, A. W., van Mourik, Y., Moons, K. G. M., & Reitsmaet, J. B. (2013). Use of expert panels to define the reference standard in diagnostic research: A systematic review of published methods and reporting. PLOS Medicine, 10(10), Article e1001531. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001531
Bond, T. G., & Fox, C. M. (2015). Applying the Rasch model: Fundamental measurement in the human sciences (3rd ed). Lawrence Erlbaum.
Brett, C., Heriot‐Maitland, C., McGuire, P., & Peters, E. (2014). Predictors of distress associated with psychotic‐like anomalous experiences in clinical and non‐clinical populations. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 53(2), 213–227. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjc.12036
Caputo, G. B., Lynn, S. J., & Houran, J. (2021). Mirror- and eye gazing: An integrative review of induced altered and anomalous experiences. Imagination, Cognition, and Personality, 40(4), 418–457. https://doi.org/10.1177/0276236620969632
Childs, C., & Murray, C. D. (2010). “We all had an experience in there together”: A discursive psychological analysis of collaborative paranormal accounts by paranormal investigation team members. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 7(1), 21–33. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780880903304543
Connors M. H. (2015). Hypnosis and belief: A review of hypnotic delusions. Consciousness and cognition, 36, 27–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2015.05.015
Cornell, A. D. (2002). Investigating the paranormal. Helix Press.
Cullum, C., Brierley, G., Perry, G. L. W., & Witkowski, E. T. F. (2017). Landscape archetypes for ecological classification and mapping. Progress in Physical Geography: Earth and Environment. 41(1), 95–123. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309133316671103
Dagnall, N., Drinkwater, K., O’Keeffe, C., Ventola, A., Laythe, B., Jawer, M. A., Massullo, B., Caputo, G. B., & Houran, J. (2020). Things that go bump in the literature: An environmental appraisal of “haunted houses.” Frontiers in Psychology, 11, Article 1328. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01328
Daniel, J. F., & Musgrave, P. (2017). Synthetic experiences: How popular culture matters for images of international relations. International Studies Quarterly, 61(3), 503–516. https://doi.org/10.1093/isq/sqx053
Davis, A. K., Clifton, J. M., Weaver, E. G., Hurwitz, E. S., Johnson, M. W., & Griffiths, R. R. (2020). Survey of entity encounter experiences occasioned by inhaled N, N-dimethyltryptamine: Phenomenology, interpretation, and enduring effects. Journal of Psychopharmacology, 34(9), 1008–1020. https://doi.org/10.1177/0269881120916143
de Raadt, A., Warrens, M. J., Bosker, R. J., & Kiers, H. A. L. (2021). A comparison of reliability coefficients for ordinal rating scales. Journal of Classification, 38, 519–543. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00357-021-09386-5
Drinkwater, K., Dagnall, N., & Bate, L. (2013). Into the unknown: Using interpretative phenomenological analysis to explore personal accounts of personal paranormal experiences. Journal of Parapsychology, 77(2), 281–294.
Drinkwater, K., Dagnall, N., Houran, J., Denovan, A., & O’Keeffe, C. (2022). Structural relationships among mental boundaries, childhood imaginary companions, and anomalous experiences. Psychological Reports. Advanced online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/00332941221123235
Drinkwater, K., Laythe, B., Houran, J., Dagnall, N., O’Keeffe, C., & Hill, S. A. (2019). Exploring gaslighting effects via the VAPUS model for ghost narratives. Australian Journal of Parapsychology, 19(2), 143–179.
Drinkwater, K., Massullo, B., Dagnall, N., Laythe, B., Boone, J., & Houran, J. (2022). Understanding consumer enchantment via paranormal tourism: Part I - Conceptual review. Cornell Hospitality Quarterly, 63(2), 195–215. https://doi.org/10.1177/1938965520967920
Dyne, R. (2010). Ghostly experiences: More than imagination, more than just a good story. Paranthropology, 1(1), 27–29.
Eaton, M. (2019). Manifesting spirits: Paranormal investigation and the narrative development of a haunting. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography 48(2), 155–182. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891241618756162
Edwards, E. D. (2005). Metaphysical media: The occult experience in popular culture. Southern Illinois University Press.
Evans, H. (1986). Spontaneous sightings of seemingly autonomous humanoid entities: A comparative study. Theta, 13/14, 10–14.
Evans, H. (1987). Gods, spirits, cosmic guardians: A comparative study of the encounter experience. Aquarian.
Evans, H. (2001). The ghost experience in a wider context. In J. Houran & R. Lange (Eds.), Hauntings and poltergeists: Multidisciplinary perspectives (pp. 41–61). Jefferson, NC: McFarland.
Goldstein, D. E., Grider, S. A., & Thomas, J. B. (2007). Haunting experiences: Ghosts in contemporary folklore. Utah State University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt4cgmqg
Guinness, H. (2023, March 21). How does ChatGPT work? Here's the human-written answer for how ChatGPT works. Zapier: App Tips. https://zapier.com/blog/how-does-chatgpt-work/ Accessed 24 March 2023.
Hill, S. A., Laythe, B., Dagnall, N., Drinkwater, K., O’Keeffe, C., Ventola, A., & Houran, J. (2019). “Meme-spirited”: II. Illustrations of the VAPUS model for ghost narratives. Australian Journal of Parapsychology, 19, 5–43.
Hill, S. A., O’Keeffe, C., Laythe, B., Dagnall, N., Drinkwater, K., Ventola, A., & Houran, J. (2018). “Meme-spirited”: I. A VAPUS model for understanding the prevalence and potency of ghost narratives. Australian Journal of Parapsychology, 18, 117–152.
Houran, J. (2000). Toward a psychology of ‘entity encounter experiences.’ Journal of the Society for Psychical Research, 64, 141-158.
Houran, J., Hill, S. A., Haynes, E. D., & Bielski, U. A. (2020). Paranormal tourism – Market study of a novel and interactive approach to space activation and monetization. Cornell Hospitality Quarterly, 61(3), 287–311. https://doi.org/10.1177/1938965520909094
Houran, J., Lange, R., & Laythe, B. (2022). Understanding consumer enchantment via paranormal tourism: Part II - Preliminary Rasch validation. Cornell Hospitality Quarterly, 63(2), 216–230. https://doi.org/10.1177/1938965520971276
Houran, J., Lange, R., Laythe, B., Dagnall, N., & Drinkwater, K., & O’Keeffe, C. (2019b). Quantifying the phenomenology of ghostly episodes – Part II: A Rasch model of spontaneous accounts. Journal of Parapsychology, 83(1), 168–192. https://doi.org/10.30891/jopar.2019.01.03
Houran, J., & Laythe, B. (2022). Case study of recognition patterns in haunted people syndrome. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, Article 879163. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.879163
Houran, J., Laythe, B., Lange, R. Dagnall, N., O’Keeffe, C., & Drinkwater, K. (2021). Ghostly episodes in modern psychometric perspective. Mindfield: Bulletin of the Parapsychological Association, 13(2), 30–40.
Houran, J., Laythe, B., Little, C., & Houran, D. J. (2023). Rethinking a ghostly episode in the legacy literature. Journal of Anomalistics, 23(1), 77-102. http://dx.doi.org/10.23793/zfa.2023.77
Houran, J., Laythe, B., O’Keeffe, C., Dagnall, N., Drinkwater, K., & Lange, R. (2019a). Quantifying the phenomenology of ghostly episodes – Part I: Need for a standard operationalization. Journal of Parapsychology, 83(1), 25–46. https://doi.org/10.30891/jopar.2019.01.03
Houran, J., Little, C., Laythe, B., & Ritson, D. W. (2022). Uncharted features and dynamics of the South Shields Poltergeist. Journal of the Society for Psychical Research, 86(3), 129–164.
Hufford, D. (1982). The terror that comes in the night: An experience-centered study of supernatural assault traditions. University of Pennsylvania Press.
Ironside, R. & Wooffitt, R. (2022). Making sense of the paranormal: The interactional construction of unexplained experiences. Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-88407-9
Jaki, S. L. (1999). God and the sun at F·tima. Real View Books.
Jawer, M. A., Massullo, B., Laythe, B., & Houran, J. (2020). Environmental “Gestalt influences” pertinent to the study of haunted houses. Journal of the Society for Psychical Research, 84(2), 65–92.
Kumar, V. K., & Pekala, R. J. (2001). Relation of hypnosis-related attitudes and behaviors to paranormal belief and experience: A technical review. In J. Houran & R. Lange (Eds.), Hauntings and poltergeists: Multidisciplinary perspectives (pp. 260-279). McFarland & Co.
Lange, R., Greyson, B., & Houran, J. (2015). Using computational linguistics to understand near-death experiences: Concurrent validity for the NDE Scale. Psychology of Consciousness: Theory, Research, and Practice, 2(1), 79–89. https://doi.org/10.1037/cns0000040
Lange, R., & Houran, J. (1996). Role of contextual mediation in direct versus reconstructed angelic encounters. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 83, 1259–1270.
Lange, R., & Houran, J. (2021). Replicable survey evidence for an ‘enchantment–psi’ loop. Journal of Transpersonal Psychology, 53(2), 140–156.
Lange, R., Houran, J., Sheridan, L., Dagnall, N., Drinkwater, K., O’Keeffe, C., & Laythe, B. (2020). Haunted people syndrome revisited: Conceptual parallels between subjective paranormal episodes and putative accounts of group-stalking. Mental Health, Religion, & Culture, 23(7), 532–549. https://doi.org/10.1080/13674676.2020.1767552
Lange, R., Irwin, H. J., & Houran, J. (2000). Top-down purification of Tobacyk’s Revised Paranormal Belief Scale. Personality and Individual Differences, 29(1), 131–156. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(99)00183-X
Lange, R., Thalbourne, M. A., Houran, J., & Storm, L. (2000). The Revised Transliminality Scale: Reliability and validity data from a Rasch top-down purification procedure. Consciousness and Cognition, 9(4), 591–617. https://doi.org/10.1006/ccog.2000.0472
Langston, W., & Hubbard, T. (2019). Shadow walking: Will a ghost walk tour affect belief in ghosts? Journal of Parapsychology, 83(1), 47–68. http://doi.org/10.30891/jopar.2019.01.04
Laythe, B., Houran, J., Dagnall, N., & Drinkwater, K. (2021). Conceptual and clinical implications of a “haunted people syndrome.” Spirituality in Clinical Practice, 8(3), 195–214. https://doi.org/10.1037/scp0000251
Laythe, B., Houran, J., Dagnall, N., Drinkwater, K., & O’Keeffe, C. (2022). Ghosted! Exploring the haunting reality of paranormal encounters. McFarland & Co.
Laythe, B., Houran, J., & Ventola, A. (2018). A split-sample psychometric study of haunters. Journal of the Society for Psychical Research, 82(4), 193–218.
Lifshitz, M., van Elk, M., & Luhrmann, T. M. (2019). Absorption and spiritual experience: A review of evidence and potential mechanisms. Consciousness and Cognition, 73, Article 102760. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2019.05.008
Little, C., Laythe, B., & Houran, J. (2021). Quali-quantitative comparison of childhood imaginary companions and ghostly episodes. Journal of the Society for Psychical Research, 85(1), 1–30.
Mack, J. E. (1994). Abduction: Human encounters with aliens. Scribner.
Maher, M. C. (1999). Riding the waves in search of the particles: A modern study of ghosts and apparitions. Journal of Parapsychology, 63(1), 47–80.
Martial, C., Cassol, H., Charland-Verville, V., Pallavicini, C., Sanz, C., Zamberlan, F., Vivot, R. M., Erowid, F., Erowid, E., Laureys, S., Greyson, B., & Tagliazucchi, E. (2019). Neurochemical models of near-death experiences: A large-scale study based on the semantic similarity of written reports. Consciousness and Cognition, 69, 52–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2019.01.011
McHarg, J. F. (1973). Poltergeist and apparitional haunting phenomena affecting the family and associates of an adolescent girl with well-controlled epilepsy. In W. G. Roll, R. L. Morris & J. D. Morris (Eds.), Research in parapsychology 1972 (pp. 17–19). Scarecrow Press.
O'Neill T. A. (2017). An overview of interrater agreement on Likert scales for researchers and practitioners. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, Article 777. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00777
Parker, A. (2021). Thought-forms gone rogue: A theory for psi-critics and parapsychologists. Journal of Scientific Exploration, 35(1), 95–132. https://doi.org/10.31275/20211901
Pattanaphanchai, J., O'Hara, K., & Hall, W. (2013). Trustworthiness criteria for supporting users to assess the credibility of web information. WWW '13 Companion: Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on World Wide Web, May, 1123–1130. https://doi.org/10.1145/2487788.2488132
Perrotta, G. (2019). The phenomenon of demonic possession: Definition, contexts and
multidisciplinary approaches. Journal of Psychology and Mental Health Care, 3(2), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.31579/2637-8892/019
Petitmengin, C., Remillieux, A., & Valenzuela-Moguillansky, C. (2019). Discovering the structures of lived experience: Towards a micro-phenomenological analysis method. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 18, 691-730. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11097-018-9597-4
Puhle, A. (2001). Learning from historical cases: Six selected poltergeist cases from the 1700s in Germany. European Journal of Parapsychology, 16, 61-72.
Rabeyron, T. (2022). When the truth is out there: Counseling people who report anomalous experiences. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, Article 693707. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.693707
Randles. J. (1997). The truth behind Men in Black: Government agents—or visitors from beyond. St. Martin’s Press.
Rasch, G. (1980). Probabilistic models for some intelligence and attainment tests (Copenhagen, Danish Institute for Educational Research), expanded edition (1980) with foreword and afterword by B. D. Wright. University of Chicago Press. (Original work published in 1960).
Roll, W. G. (1977). Poltergeists. In B. B. Wolman (Ed.), Handbook of parapsychology (pp. 382–413). Van Nostrand Reinhold.
Ross, C. A., & Joshi, S. (1992). Paranormal experiences in the general population. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 180(6), 357–361. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005053-199206000-00004
Roxburgh, E. C., & Evenden, R. E. (2016). ‘They daren’t tell people’: Therapists’ experiences of working with clients who report anomalous experiences. European Journal of Psychotherapy & Counselling, 18(2), 123–141. https://doi.org/10.1080/13642537.2016.1170059
Seamon, D. (2000). A way of seeing people and place: Phenomenology in environment-behavior research. In S. Wapner, J. Demick, T. Yamamoto, & H. Minami (Eds.), Theoretical perspectives in environment-behavior research: Underlying assumptions, research problems, and methodologies (pp. 157–178). Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Sheridan, L., James, D. V., & Roth, J. (2020). The phenomenology of group stalking (‘gang-stalking’): A content analysis of subjective experiences. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(7), Article 2506. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17072506
Tobacyk, J. J. (1988). A Revised Paranormal Belief Scale. Unpublished manuscript, Louisiana Tech University, Ruston, LA
Tobacyk, J. (2004). The Revised Paranormal Belief Scale. International Journal of Transpersonal Studies, 23(1), 94–98. https://doi.org/10.24972/ijts.2004.23.1.94
van Es, N., Reijnders, S., Bolderman, L., & Waysdorf, A. (Eds.) (2021). Locating imagination in popular culture: Place, tourism and belonging. Routledge.
Waskul, D., & Eaton, M. (Eds.) (2018). The supernatural in society, culture, and history. Templeton University Press.
Winsberg, E. (2022, Winter ed.). Computer simulations in science. In E. N. Zalta & U. Nodelman (Eds.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2022/entries/simulations-science/
Young, S. (2018). Children who see fairies. Journal for the Study of Religious Experience, 4(1), 81–98.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 James Houran, Brian Laythe
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
All articles published in JAEX are open access, freely and universally accessible online, and archived in the open journal’s Lund University website (https://journals.lub.lu.se). Articles in JAEX can be distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License CCBY (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, with appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, a link to the Creative Commons license, and an indication if changes were made.
