Anomalous Mind-Matter Influence, Free Will, and the Nature of Causality
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31156/jaex.24215Keywords:
causality, psychokinesis, consciousness, free will, dispositionalism, quantum mechanics, PK, anomalous influenceAbstract
This paper proposes a framework that supports both free will and anomalous mind-matter interaction (psychokinesis). I begin by considering the argument by the physicist Sean Carroll that the laws of physics as we understand them rule out psychokinesis (and other modes of psi), and find his claims problematic, in part due to misunderstandings of arguments borrowed from David Hume. I proceed to consider a more dispositional notion of causality (in contrast to one characterized by universal and necessary laws) which is more hospitable to both psychokinesis and free will. I then incorporate recent work from the philosophy of mind and science to arrive at a framework that supports real volition and psychokinesis, which are intimately linked. This approach is fundamentally dispositional but grounded in an ontologically prior field of awareness and potentiality. I also consider that the regularities (or causal natures) we observe in our physical world are ultimately supported by teleological “intentions” within a nonlocal, mind-like quantum ground.
References
Albert, D. Z. (2013). Wave function realism. In A. Ney & D. Z. Albert (Eds.), The wave function: Essays on the metaphysics of quantum mechanics (pp. 52–57). Oxford University Press.
Alter, T. A., & Nagasawa, Y. (Eds.). (2015). Consciousness in the physical world: Perspectives on Russellian monism. Oxford University Press.
Anjum, R. L., & Mumford, S. (2018). What tends to be: The philosophy of dispositional modality. Routledge.
Bird, A. (2007). Nature’s metaphysics: Laws and properties. Oxford University Press.
Bohm, D. (1980). Wholeness and the implicate order. Routledge.
Bohm, D., & Hiley, B. J. (1993). The undivided universe: An ontological interpretation
of quantum theory. Routledge.
Bosch, H.., Steinkamp, F., & Boller, E. (2006). Examining psychokinesis: The interaction of human intention with random number generators—a meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 132(4), 497-523. Doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.132.4.497
Broderick, D., & Goertzel, B. (Eds.). (2015). Evidence for psi: Thirteen empirical research reports. McFarland.
Cardeña, E. (2018). The experimental evidence for parapsychological phenomena: A review. American Psychologist, 73(5), 663-677. https://doi: 10.1037/amp0000236
Carr, B. (2015). Hyperspatial models of matter and mind. In. E. Kelly, A. Crabtree, & P. Marshall (Eds.), Beyond physicalism: Toward reconciliation of science and spirituality (pp.227-273). Rowman & Littlefield.
Carr, B. (2019). Blind watchers of psi: A rebuttal of Reber and Alcock. Journal of Scientific
Exploration, 33(4), 643-660. Doi: 10.31275/2019/1693
Carroll, S. (February 18, 2008). Telekinesis and quantum field theory. In truth, on the atoms and the void. https://www.preposterousuniverse.com/blog/2008/02/18/telekinesis-and-quantum-field-theory/
Carroll, S. (2017). The big picture: on the origins of life, meaning, and the universe itself. Penguin.
Carroll, S. (2021). Consciousness and the laws of physics. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 28(9-10), 16-31. https://doi: 10.53765/20512201.28.9.016
Cartwright, N. (1983). How the laws of physics lie. Oxford University Press.
Chakravartty, A. (2007). A metaphysics for scientific realism: Knowing the unobservable. Cambridge University Press.
Choi, S., & Fara, M. (2018). Dispositions, In E. N. Zalta (ed.) Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Spring 2021 ed.), Stanford University. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2021/entries/dispositions/
Goff, P. (2018). Is the universe a conscious mind? Aeon. N. Retrieved from https://aeon.co/essays/cosmopsychism-explains-why-the-universe-is-fine-tuned-for-life
Goff, P. (2021). Putting consciousness first: Replies to critics. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 28(9-10), 289-328. https://doi: 10.53765/20512201.28.9.289
Heisenberg, W. (1958). Physics and philosophy: The revolution in modern science. Harper & Brothers.
Hume, D. (2007) An enquiry concerning human understanding and other writings. (P. Millican, Ed.). Oxford University Press.
Illari, P., & Russo, F. (2014). Causality: Philosophical theory meets scientific practice. Oxford University Press.
Ismael, J., & Schaffer, J. (2020). Quantum holism: Nonseparability as common ground.
Synthese. 197 (10), 4131–4160. https://doi: 10.1007/s11229-016-1201-2
James, W. (1911). Some problems of philosophy: A beginning of an introduction to philosophy. Longmans, Green & Co.
Josephson, B. (July 9, 2022). Comments on Pinker’s view of the paranormal. Galileo Commission. https://galileocommission.org/comments-on-pinkers-view-of-the-paranormal-prof-brian-josephson/
Kastner, R., Kauffman, S., & Epperson, M. (2018). Taking Heisenberg’s potentia seriously.
arXiv preprint arXiv:1709.03595. https://doi: 10.48550/arXiv.1709.03595.
Kauffman, S., & Radin, D. (2021). Quantum aspects of the brain-mind relationship: A hypothesis with supporting evidence. Biosystems. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystems.2022.104820
Lowe, E. J., (2013). The will as a rational free power. In R. Groff & J. Greco (Ed.), Powers and
capacities in philosophy: The new Aristotelianism. Routledge.
Marais, A., Adams, B., Ringsmuth, A.K., Ferretti, M., Gruber, J.M., Hendrikx, R., Schuld, M., Smith, S., Sinayskiy, I., Kruger, J., Petruccione, F. & Grondelle, R. (2018) The future of quantum biology. Journal of the Royal Society Interface, 15 (148), 20180640.
https://doi: 10.1098/rsif.2018.0640
May, E., Utts, J. M., Spottiswoode, S. J. P., (1995). Decision augmentation theory: Toward a
model of anomalous mental phenomena. Journal of Parapsychology, 59, 195-220.
Mørch, H. (2020). The argument for panpsychism from experience of causation. In W.
Seager (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of panpsychism (pp.264-289). Routledge.
Nagel, T. (2012). Mind and cosmos. Oxford University Press.
Nelson, R. D. (2015). Implicit physical psi: The global consciousness project. In E. Cardeña, J. Palmer, & D. Marcusson-Clavertz (Eds.), Parapsychology: A handbook for the 21st century (pp. 282–292). McFarland.
Ney, A. (2020). Separability, locality, and higher dimensions in quantum mechanics. In S. Dasgupta, R. Dotan, & B. Weslake (Eds.), Current controversies in philosophy of science (pp. 75-89). Routledge.
Pinker, S. (2021). Rationality: What it is, why it seems scarce, why it matters. Penguin.
Reber, A. S., & Alcock, J. E. (2019). Searching for the impossible: Parapsychology’s elusive
quest. American Psychologist. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000486
Rosenthal, R. (1990). Replication in behavioral research. Journal of Social Behavior and
Personality, 5,(4), 1-30.
Russell, B. (1927). The analysis of matter. Kegan Paul.
Schopenhauer, A. (1966). The world as will and representation, Vol 1 (E. F. J. Payne, Trans.).
Dover.
Stapp, H. P. (2017). Quantum theory and free will. Springer. https://doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-58301-3
Williams, G. (2019). Should we accept arguments from skeptics to ignore the psi data? A comment on Reber and Alcock’s “Searching for the impossible.” Journal of Scientific Exploration, 33(4), 623-642. https://doi: 10.31275/2019/1681
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 George Williams
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
All articles published in JAEX are open access, freely and universally accessible online, and archived in the open journal’s Lund University website (https://journals.lub.lu.se). Articles in JAEX can be distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License CCBY (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, with appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, a link to the Creative Commons license, and an indication if changes were made.
