A Possible Case of Censorship of Submissions on the Nature of Consciousness





consciousness, mind–brain relationship, scientific journal, dogmatism, physicalism, dualism, scientific communication


 To advance the scientific understanding of consciousness, one should be open to theoretical pluralism to freely develop and rigorously test a wide diversity of paradigm candidates and communicate the ideas and findings to the scientific community. Science development is jeopardized when journals tend to present a field’s state-of-the-art findings in a biased or misguided way or suppress investigations of a particular perspective. We describe the challenges and pitfalls we faced as guest editors during the editorial review process of a special issue of the journal Frontiers on “The Nature of Consciousness” and how we responded to it. We describe and discuss how the journal staff overruled our editorial role to enforce what was very likely academic censorship. We then offer a couple of recommendations to authors and editors that may face similar issues. We believe that following these recommendations will ultimately contribute to practical and theoretical advances in the understanding the nature of consciousness and the mind–brain relation.


Cardeña, E. (2014). A call for an open, informed study of all aspects of consciousness. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8, 1-4. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00017

Cardeña, E. (2015). The unbearable fear of psi: On scientific censorship in the 21st century. Journal of Scientific Exploration, 29(4), 601–620.

Chibeni, S. S., & Moreira-Almeida, A. (2007). Remarks on the scientific exploration of "anomalous" psychiatric phenomena. Archives of Clinical Psychiatry, 34, 8–16. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0101-60832007000700003.

Kuhn, T. S. (1970). The structure of scientific revolutions (2nd ed.). University of Chicago Press.

Lakatos, I., & Musgrave, A. (1970). Criticism and the growth of knowledge. Cambridge University Press.

Moreira-Almeida, A., & Araujo, S. d. F. (2017). The mind-brain problem in psychiatry: Why theoretical pluralism is better than theoretical monism. Dialogues in Philosophy, Mental and Neuro Sciences, 10, 23–25.

Moreira-Almeida, A., Araujo, S. F., & Cloninger, C. R. (2018). The presentation of the mind-brain problem in leading psychiatry journals. Brazilian Journal of Psychiatry, 40(3), 335–342. https://doi.org/10.1590/1516-4446-2017-2342.




How to Cite

Weiler, M., Fernandes Casseb, R., & Moreira-Almeida, A. (2022). A Possible Case of Censorship of Submissions on the Nature of Consciousness. Journal of Anomalous Experience and Cognition, 2(2), 297–315. https://doi.org/10.31156/jaex.24121



Theoretical and methodological papers