Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Articles

2011: Readership Course

Developing Independence as Young Academics at LTH

Submitted
January 21, 2013
Published
January 21, 2013

Abstract

In this particular study, the independence of postdoctoral researchers at LTH has been inves-tigated using the time elapsed from the Ph.D. graduation until the first publication in which neither the Ph.D. supervisor nor co-supervisor are co-authors. The method used in this case is an e-mail survey sent to 99 researchers at Electrical and Information Technology, Computer Science, Measurement Technology and Industrial Electrical Engineering, Mechanical Engi-neering, Automatic Control and Solid Mechanics, Mathematics and Mathematical Physics, Atomic Physics, Solid State Physics, Combustion Physics, and Physics. 37% of the respond-ents replied to the questionnaire and the gathered information was evaluated using survival analysis. The questionnaire also contained open-ended questions with respect to perceived independence, giving the opportunity to also draw qualitative conclusions from the study.
From the performed survey, a few conclusions may be drawn. First of all, it is not necessarily so that researcher publishes papers without their main Ph.D. supervisor, even at a significant time after graduation. This can be due to several reasons, one being the dependence of fund-ing related to the supervisor and another reason being the inclusion of the department or re-search group head in all publications. Interestingly, this is underlined by the fact that some respondents considered themselves independent from their supervisor, even without publish-ing anything on their own.
The qualitative analysis showed that, even if this could not be statistically proven, a higher degree of independence (at least as experienced by the respondents) was achieved by switch-ing research group or university. It is also quite clear that the lack of independence is not nec-essarily considered as a negative thing in the eyes of the respondents. The time after gradua-tion is also an important factor in the experience of independence, with a longer time leading to a higher degree of perceived independence.