Mirakler och historievetenskaplig metod
En replik till Mats Wahlberg
In response to Mats Wahlberg's critique, we clarify the theoretical and methodological underpinnings of our previous treatment of miracles narrated in the Gospels. Whereas Wahlberg laments our consistent exclusion of alleged supernatural and miraculous factors from historiographical work, and suggests that "pragmatic agnosticism" would be preferable over against the methodological atheism that we espouse, we seek to defend our point of departure as the only viable principle for historical scholarship. We do so by pointing out a series of distinctions not sufficiently noted by Wahlberg, by discussing the definition of "miracle," and by arguing that any attempt to approach the question of Jesus' resurrection with pragmatic agnosticism can only lead to the dissolution of commonly recognised fundamentals of historical enquiry. Finally, we observe that questions about the existence of God and the possibility of miracles are not normally dealt with in the scholarly work of historians, and conclude that there is no reason why these questions should be introduced in the historical-critical study of Jesus and Christian origins either.
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication, with the work 6 (six) months after publication simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.